Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Muur

40 man or 30 man Rumble?

40/30  

56 members have voted

  1. 1. 30/40 man Rumble



Recommended Posts

Which would you prefer? for me, I think I prefer 40, it's a better number and ever since the one with 40, I've felt like 30 isn't enough plus it limits the amount of pointless/quick entrants, so we can get more bigger ones. 5 1 min would have a big effect on a 30 man but a lesser on 40.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you get too many jobbers in 40 man rumbles...but the current roster is definitely stacked. Factor in surprises, and I think you probably have a better time to do a 40 man rumble this year than any other year in the past...that said, I think a 30 man match is probably still for the best...unless they're going all-out with surprise entrants. If they have like...5 really big surprise entrants...then I think a 40 man rumble would be better. If not, then stick with 30. And the women should have a 20 woman rumble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

40 man Rumble would be cool if executed right, with a number of surprise entrants like Gen said. 2011 Rumble's execution was eh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wanted this years to be a 40 man.

 

I think 30 is just short of enough so 40 is a good number, especially if there are stupid entrees like Primo and Epico lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which would you prefer? for me, I think I prefer 40, it's a better number and ever since the one with 40, I've felt like 30 isn't enough plus it limits the amount of pointless/quick entrants, so we can get more bigger ones. 5 1 min would have a big effect on a 30 man but a lesser on 40.

 

What a terrible thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I say 30 cause 40 was just an addition of a shitload of jobbers. However that said i would like to see one more 40 man rumble these days since the roster is so big and good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It should be 40. With the ever expanding roster I think it makes sense. 30 men isn't enough anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres easily enough stars on the roster for a 40 man rumble, if you throw in a couple of the bigger NXT/Cruiserweight/UK stars, the part timers like Lesner, Goldberg etc plus a few surprise entrants too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like 40 but only if that means more surprises. That's why I was excited but then let down during the 2011 one, I mean Booker & Diesel were cool, but we usually get like two in a regular Rumble anyway. With 40, you could get 15 from each brand and then like 5 Legends and 5 NXT guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

40 would definitely be better. The only reason the 2011 one was lackluster was because of New Nexus and then Cenaswoggle having these long intervals of running the thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you get too many jobbers in 40 man rumbles...but the current roster is definitely stacked. Factor in surprises, and I think you probably have a better time to do a 40 man rumble this year than any other year in the past...that said, I think a 30 man match is probably still for the best...unless they're going all-out with surprise entrants. If they have like...5 really big surprise entrants...then I think a 40 man rumble would be better. If not, then stick with 30. And the women should have a 20 woman rumble.

Blah, I would hate rumbles with nothing but main eventers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

40 for me. We already have 15 announced entries last time I checked. with 40 they have more entires to give us suprises.l and I don't mind jobers in the Runble because they put them in anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Misusing some of the great talent during the rumble match is the only thing that will come of this. Hell WWE hasn't booked a good 30 man rumble in years besides last year's rumble. You think they are capable of doing that with 40? I don't see it at all. In fact, the winner of the first 40 man rumble ever should've given us a 92 Ric Flair ambience and it was the opposite. The majority of fans were livid because the winner didn't even have any highlight moments throughout the entire rumble match. On top of that he was a very late entry into the rumble so that killed all chances of even creating moments for himself to make his win much more memorable than a Booker T and Diesel return.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would rather have a very solid 30 man rumble, than a 40 man rumble with lower midcarders and jobbers. Seeing Jey Uso (for example) enter the Rumble, you know fine well that Jimmy Uso is going to be in it. But when Jimmy hasn't entered, and there are like 3 more entrants, it kind of kills the surprise, as you can begin to guess who is left. I'd rather it was just singles wrestlers, the odd return, and a few NXT wrestlers, but keep it 30.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering the roster is pretty huge I would say 40..

I mean you can fill a Royal Rumble with the Raw roster alone..

And when you don't do that,some guys that are upper midcarders are gonna play second fidle to some main eventers like Lesnar and Goldberg even though they don't deserve that treatment.Like staying in the Rumble for only 2 minutes then get eliminated cause you can't have 10 men in the ring at the same time and someone has to look strong with 5 or 6 eliminations.It is happening every year and I am afraid it's gonna happen again this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

40.

 

Put in a lot of jobbers? Oh no how dare they give everyone on their roster a main event spot for one night of the year. You know that they're not going to win? How about just enjoy seeing them for once.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

30. 40 is overkill and gives them added incentive to have factions dominate in the match, which I absolutely despise (one of the main reasons 2011's RR match sucked balls).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

40.

 

Put in a lot of jobbers? Oh no how dare they give everyone on their roster a main event spot for one night of the year. You know that they're not going to win? How about just enjoy seeing them for once.

 

How about you stop telling people what to like? wtf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definately 40, especially with all the talent that have been signed recently (cruiserweights, UK, etc). Also I can never get enough of Royal Rumble :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

40.

 

Put in a lot of jobbers? Oh no how dare they give everyone on their roster a main event spot for one night of the year. You know that they're not going to win? How about just enjoy seeing them for once.

How about you stop telling people what to like? wtf

How about it was a suggestion and not a command ... I know that's crazy right :o

 

Tell me where I told people what to like. Go on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...