Hitman_Hart Posted April 14, 2006 Report Share Posted April 14, 2006 [b]One of the major concerns in games would have to be the roster. We also look into the roster in each game – we want to see who is in it; our favorite superstars, etc. and who make up the under card. Is it updated and accurate? However, another concern is definitely the graphics. As good as they might be in the year prior, it leaves a bad taste in your mouth, if the graphics are not updated or looking good at all. Imagine playing SVR with HCTP graphics – it would look too similar to HCTP. So in the end of it all, with both concerns in mind, which do you believe is most important when it comes down to the SmackDown games? The roster or graphics? You may only choose one, and back up one case – don’t say a mixture.[/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twiggles Posted April 14, 2006 Report Share Posted April 14, 2006 I'm going to say Graphics over Roster. Yes, a roster may be important but that's what Create-A-Wrestler (CAW) is all about. If you go back to the first Smackdown! game for the Playstation the graphics were not so good... Graphics ARE the game. Look at games like Grand Theft Auto or Final Fantasy which have advanced over the years of it's first release graphic wise. That's what I think, but everyone is entitled to their own opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impthony Peachtano Posted April 14, 2006 Report Share Posted April 14, 2006 both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMod Posted April 14, 2006 Report Share Posted April 14, 2006 i mean if your gonna make an improvment on the roster i mean u might as well make an improvement on graphics . . . of course on the next gen, they will have more to work with so i think they will do both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
- CM Punk - Posted April 14, 2006 Report Share Posted April 14, 2006 both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunchbox Posted April 14, 2006 Report Share Posted April 14, 2006 Roster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
..:::Burnout:::.. Posted April 14, 2006 Report Share Posted April 14, 2006 Both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jos-B Posted April 15, 2006 Report Share Posted April 15, 2006 I'd rather have a more complete roster, as long as the graphics are better than the previous installment, I'm fine with it. But more important to both for me would be gameplay. For example, Fire Pro Wrestling is horrible in the graphics department, but the fact that it has about every move EVER, and every promotion and wrestler (misnomered of course) in it, along with solid gameplay, makes me like it as much as SvR 2006. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
» CMP Posted July 23, 2006 Report Share Posted July 23, 2006 both reli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
вlueprint Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 Why in the bloody hell can't THQ make both for once.... either they focus too much time on graphics... or gameplay... or roster... or a certain match....instead of just having them all.... WE ARE IN 2006 for crying out loud!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindset Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 i care more about the roster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
вlueprint Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 [quote name='Pedro_PBR' post='390397' date='Jul 23 2006, 09:20 PM']i care more about the roster[/quote] [size=5]Me too.... because once you've got all of that... you will soon get titred of looking at the hot graphics of the entrance and so on.... but now you don't have an updated roster of wrestlers...and usually not updated wrestlers means not much wrestlers to choose from.... SVR is a perfect example.... of improved graphics but thee worst roster.... :annoy[/size]: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xhumation Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 Bit of both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Th31On3 Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 Roster as long as we get to play with new wrestlers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-X Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 gameplay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KBC Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 id rahter have an up-to-date over graphics but both are just as important as each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoãoC Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 [quote name='Twigglified' post='98306' date='Apr 14 2006, 06:53 PM']I'm going to say Graphics over Roster. Yes, a roster may be important but that's what Create-A-Wrestler (CAW) is all about. If you go back to the first Smackdown! game for the Playstation the graphics were not so good... Graphics ARE the game. Look at games like Grand Theft Auto or Final Fantasy which have advanced over the years of it's first release graphic wise. That's what I think, but everyone is entitled to their own opinions. [/quote] I Agree. But both are very important imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.