Jump to content

WWE Show Discussion


Jeb ★

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

35 minutes ago, Senex Beast said:

Cody is not necessarily screwed if he wrestles Seth and wins that title

That title is nowhere near the level of Romans. It's like getting 2nd place.

Cody winning in the rumble and not avenging his wrestlemania loss to Roman isn't a good look. There's no good way to dice it, he lost his spot to The Rock.

Edited by Kman
Link to comment
54 minutes ago, Senex Beast said:

What's wrong with Rock vs Roman? Cody beats Seth in a better match and wins that world title

Cody has  beaten Seth 3 times already.

 

The whole point was to do it against Roman, hell they even emphasized that he won the Rumble to get to Roman who was visibly against Cody winning because he considers him his only threat.

 

Wtv he and Seth are going to cook it wont be as fleshed out as him and Roman would've been. 

 

Also if Cody wanted the WHC why didn't he challenge Seth before? Seth has been issuing challenges to everyone, why wait to win the Rumble? 

 

Everything about Cody going for the WHC makes him look dumb

Edited by Golden Boy®
Link to comment

Triple H is disappointing me greatly. Giving priority to a retired legend rather than a young, relevant star who's got an interesting and emotional storyline going with fans invested is something I would expect out of Vince, not Paul. What was the point of giving Cody a second Rumble win? How hard it is to make Rock vs Roman at night 1 and Cody vs Roman at night 2? By the time Cody finishes his goddamn story, no one is gonna care but him. Way to remove all the excitement of the road to Wrestlemania.

Edited by T-Hell
Link to comment

Why do people think it set in stone that Cody will face Seth. Could just be a red herring. I think Cody gets screwed again at EC and then Roman will main event both nights of Mania. Now I think Reigns needs to beat Rock night one and then Cody wins night 2. There you covered the loss of the Punk spot, Seth faces someone else, you get Rock/Reigns, Cody still honors the Rumble victory, and Cody finishes the story. All Cody said was he moved the goal post, that could just mean he moved it up, he never confirmed going after Seth.

Edited by BestInTheWorld614
Link to comment

I don't even hate what happened as much as other people seem to. I literally accepted this when the rumors started about Rock, months ago. I never thought Cody/Reigns was going to happen...not even when he won the Rumble a second time. The thought was just never in my mind. 

I don't agree with the booking. I think you could have had Cody dethrone Reigns...and then the Mania match could be Rock/Reigns WITHOUT the title. I think it's typical WWE "all or nothing" booking, which I've grown to loathe. But...the stuff that happened on SD? Doesn't bother me. It was a foregone conclusion.

I don't see The Rock actually winning the match at Mania. I think this just makes it obvious that they intend to keep building Roman's record. It's definitely the only chance they'll ever have to do it. It will never happen again. So...how long do they run with that? I highly doubt Rock wins. Rock can take that loss...Cody can't. So, that's why he doesn't get the match yet.

Edited by Generations
Link to comment
19 minutes ago, Generations said:

I don't even hate what happened as much as other people seem to. I literally accepted this when the rumors started about Rock, months ago. I never thought Cody/Reigns was going to happen...not even when he won the Rumble a second time. The thought was just never in my mind. 

I don't agree with the booking. I think you could have had Cody dethrone Reigns...and then the Mania match could be Rock/Reigns WITHOUT the title. I think it's typical WWE "all or nothing" booking, which I've grown to loathe. But...the stuff that happened on SD? Doesn't bother me. It was a foregone conclusion.

I don't see The Rock actually winning the match at Mania. I think this just makes it obvious that they intend to keep building Roman's record. It's definitely the only chance they'll ever have to do it. It will never happen again. So...how long do they run with that? I highly doubt Rock wins. Rock can take that loss...Cody can't. So, that's why he doesn't get the match yet.

I see your point but I dont get the obsession WWE has with the record, I mean I love Roman but they are clearly out of ideas to keep the title on him.

 

And to make things worse this is self inflicted, they had countless opportunities to dethrone the guy while keeping him top dog enough to have a tribal fight against The Rock yet they fumbled it.

 

As for Cody, him saying he wont finish the story at Mania is what triggered people the most

Edited by Golden Boy®
Link to comment
3 hours ago, Golden Boy® said:

 

 

 

Lmao but The Rock sells, yeah.. It's so fascinating how they managed to make people despise something that they actually wanted to happen previously just because of the poor timing they chose to execute it. Batista 2014 all over again.

Link to comment
59 minutes ago, Generations said:

I don't see The Rock actually winning the match at Mania. I think this just makes it obvious that they intend to keep building Roman's record.

This is what triggers me the most, the fact that we know Dwayne isn't winning and that they seemingly intend to keep Roman's now more than bland stupid record going. The reign ran its course months ago.

Link to comment

I've wanted to see Rock vs Roman for a long time now and at Mania but yeah wrong timing and definitely Batista 2014 all over. I'll also be very surprised if Rock actually goes over because Roman's..Reign is definitely just going to keep going for a long while more.

 

If not Cody nor Rock then who and when? They're going Andre or Bruno with Roman!?

Link to comment

My biggest issue with Rock vs Roman is that it doesn't necessarily need the title, it's already the biggest match and it's not like they need it for to sell or hype up Wrestlemania at all. Are we supposed to have another year of Roman as champion? And why at the expense of Cody and the story they've built up over two years. Nobody looks better coming of this.

Link to comment

I like what they're doing with Rock and Roman, the timing is a little debatable, especially considering Rock just joined the TKO board. I'm willing to ride it out and see what happens.

Is there legit heat between Rollins and Reigns? These promos lately they are just spitting fire.

Link to comment

Yeah that's very true. Cody could beat Roman at WM and a pissed off Roman at the next Smackdown could say he'll prove he's still chief and head of the table and be dominant again even though lose chances at the title again and claim he still leads his family or something and just set set up Rock vs Roman at Summerslam and it would still be a huge match and at s top wwe PLE  thst is considered summer's WM

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...