OPC Posted October 1, 2019 Report Share Posted October 1, 2019 (edited) I hope Tessa gets to WWE asap. Hopefully she'll come over when her current contract expires. Why? So she can stop having matches with men (most of what has got her over), and probably lose to Becky Lynch for no reason? Or be partnered up with Alicia Fox or some shit? Tessa is doing good things outside of WWE. I'm sure she has no interest in abandoning that so she can be told exactly what WWE wants her to say and do. With 100% honesty, Tessa is almost at the point where she could win a heavyweight title and it would be believable. Throwing that away to be another woman on WWE hardly seems like a great idea to me. What do you mean lose to Becky Lynch for no reason? if those two worked together the creative team would put together a reason for her to win or lose with some kind of storyline. WWE has done intergender matches not too long ago so its not impossible to think that they'd try something with Tessa if the opportunity presents itself to them. Edited October 1, 2019 by OPC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Warden Posted October 1, 2019 Report Share Posted October 1, 2019 Im talking about as soon as he wraps up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted October 1, 2019 Report Share Posted October 1, 2019 WWE has done intergender matches not too long ago I'd like to know what your definition of "not too long" would be... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King RyderFan Posted October 1, 2019 Report Share Posted October 1, 2019 WWE has done intergender matches not too long ago I'd like to know what your definition of "not too long" would be... Ellworth Vs Lynch and Nia in the Rumble would be my guesses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted October 1, 2019 Report Share Posted October 1, 2019 (edited) WWE has done intergender matches not too long ago I'd like to know what your definition of "not too long" would be... Ellworth Vs Lynch and Nia in the Rumble would be my guesses. I'd hardly compare those to the stuff Blanchard is doing with a straight face. One-sided beat-downs are hardly "matches". Becky whooped Ellsworth's ass with him having zero offense. And Nia had a couple planned spots in a segment. Those are far from "doing inter-gender wrestling". Edited October 1, 2019 by Generations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango kid Posted October 1, 2019 Report Share Posted October 1, 2019 Think it's stupid they say it's a season premiere when it's not like they disappear for a couple months Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AONO. Posted October 1, 2019 Report Share Posted October 1, 2019 thats maybe unpopular in Vinces office Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEGION Posted October 1, 2019 Report Share Posted October 1, 2019 That's not how seasons work though It's stupid that the WWE spams the term nonstop, but other than that...Seasons for TV shows exist. Even weekly ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted October 1, 2019 Report Share Posted October 1, 2019 (edited) It seems like WWE has two variations of "seasons" as well...which makes it all even more bizarre. Like...they definitely celebrate yearly anniversaries. But, at the same time, they tend to call revamps "seasons" as well. Any time that a show gets a new intro or a reboot, or a new set, or they choose to go in a new direction, it seems like they always call that a "season premiere". I don't know...I get that pro wrestling is different from traditional sports. But, there should be some constant. It seems kind of blatant at this point, that they just use the term "season premiere" when the ratings are low and they want to freshen things up. But...that's just my opinion. Edited October 1, 2019 by Generations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Counting Lights Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 Other than Roderick Strong, the Undisputed Era is a faction of really shitty finishers. The Last Shot is a weak move for a main eventer, and Fish/O'Reilly's finisher combo's are pretty wack too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeb ★ Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 Hard to pick up heavy guys for the Kneedrop Brainbuster and Panama Sunrise I like Last Shot but yeah the other two are a better part of his arsenal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St★rstruck Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 The Panama Sunrise is a move I wish Cole would stop doing completely. The set-up irks me. Also, O'Reilly and Strong > O'Reilly and Fish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bushy. Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 Stop using completely?? No way. I just wish the use of it was turned down by everyone. I agree with Strong & OReilly even though Fish & OReilly are the OG team for yeaaaaaaars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AONO. Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 Ladt Shit is a direct knee to the head or back of the head, many times without a knee pad... Doesn't even look weak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King RyderFan Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 Ladt Shit is a direct knee to the head or back of the head, many times without a knee pad... Doesn't even look weak. Please dont edit this. TBH, End of Heartache is the only finisher of theirs I like, and the setup for the Panama Sunrise is so shit. Why jump off the middle rope if youre just gonna land on the mat without doing anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeb ★ Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 I always thought it gives him kind of a boost since he can't do the Canadian Destroyer flip from a normal Piledriver setup lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Counting Lights Posted October 4, 2019 Report Share Posted October 4, 2019 Ladt Shit is a direct knee to the head or back of the head, many times without a knee pad... Doesn't even look weak. But the way it's done looks more like an awkward Leg Lariat. Compare it to like, Nakamura's knee to the back. It's night and day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunchbox Posted October 5, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 Brock isn't a good heel. Yes, people should hate him, but i feel like people just don't watch when hes the champ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nerd Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 Brock is the best heel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willows Way Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 Hes really not. Half the time hes getting go away heat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nerd Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 Go away heat is such a dated term. But I don't see it. Brock still gets a reaction. That's all I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 (edited) Brock gets legitimate heat. Not sure how anyone can doubt that. He only gets "go away heat" when he follows the script exactly as WWE tells him, and shows none of his own personality. Any time that he does anything remotely unpredictable, he is one of the best heels in the entire industry. If his natural charisma shines through for even a fraction of a second, it's either hilarious or terrifying. Either way, it's guaranteed entertainment when it happens. Edited October 5, 2019 by Generations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Counting Lights Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 I legit cancelled my Network subscription because of Brock winning MitB. So for me, he really does have "If you're the focus, I'm not watching this product" heat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 (edited) People are entitled to have their meltdowns about whoever they want to...but that doesn't make a character objectively bad. I think we can all agree that Brock shouldn't be winning titles so often, and he shouldn't constantly be the "top guy"...but that's a separate issue aside from whether he's a quality performer or not. Edited October 5, 2019 by Generations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Counting Lights Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 It's not even the character, it's how its handled. Brock matches are total shit 9 times out of 10. He's had a few good ones since returning (Punk, Styles, Bryan) but most of em are lazy, half assed showings. He is given the spotlight over far more entertaining choices, and is handed title after title, which he does nothing for. Brock's not what I find entertaining, and knowing we enter an era of "Brock is our guy", especially when it comes at the expense of people who I actually do like, immediately discourages me from watching the shows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now