Jmerc Posted April 2, 2019 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 There we go unification match That's not what was said... You mean like how every "winner takes all" match ends with unification? Seth vs. Cena didn't end with a unification of the WWE championship and US championship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EJ! Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Winner-takes-all =/= unification Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlterNation Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Completely unnecessary to do all this crap. The Smackdown title didn't need to be included in this match at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King RyderFan Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Winner-takes-all =/= unification It's where WWE goes 99.999999% of the time though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EJ! Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Winner-takes-all =/= unificationIt's where WWE goes 99.999999% of the time though. Im not seeing it this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmerc Posted April 2, 2019 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 I'll be excited for the match when it starts but the Lesnar/Rollins build has be BOOOTAAAY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King RyderFan Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Winner-takes-all =/= unificationIt's where WWE goes 99.999999% of the time though.Im not seeing it this time. I am. And even if they don't unify one will have to play second fiddle to the other. It's a shitty situation no matter what way you look at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Brock ain't even looking too big these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EJ! Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Winner-takes-all =/= unificationIt's where WWE goes 99.999999% of the time though.Im not seeing it this time.I am. And even if they don't unify one will have to play second fiddle to the other. It's a shitty situation no matter what way you look at it. It is dumb and maybe Im being foolishly optimistic but I can easily see the winner losing one of the belts to shenanigans, especially with no rematch clause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King RyderFan Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 There we go unification match That's not what was said... You mean like how every "winner takes all" match ends with unification? Seth vs. Cena didn't end with a unification of the WWE championship and US championship. Carlito & Primo Vs Miz & Morrison, WM 25 HHH Vs Kane, No Mercy 2002 Melina Vs Layla, Night of Champions 2010 Cena Vs Orton, TLC 2013 Need I go on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EJ! Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Does this mean Seth is losing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmerc Posted April 2, 2019 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 There we go unification match That's not what was said... You mean like how every "winner takes all" match ends with unification? Seth vs. Cena didn't end with a unification of the WWE championship and US championship. Carlito & Primo Vs Miz & Morrison, WM 25 HHH Vs Kane, No Mercy 2002 Melina Vs Layla, Night of Champions 2010 Cena Vs Orton, TLC 2013 Need I go on? Okay but I literally gave you an example where that didn't happen.... so? You said "every". You were wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King RyderFan Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Winner-takes-all =/= unificationIt's where WWE goes 99.999999% of the time though.Im not seeing it this time.I am. And even if they don't unify one will have to play second fiddle to the other. It's a shitty situation no matter what way you look at it.It is dumb and maybe Im being foolishly optimistic but I can easily see the winner losing one of the belts to shenanigans, especially with no rematch clause. When though? RAW the next night? Great another one day title run. A few months down the line? We have a second fiddle situation, plus if you win one belt why shouldn't you get the other too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Vercetti Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Brock still aint learned smh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King RyderFan Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 There we go unification match That's not what was said... You mean like how every "winner takes all" match ends with unification? Seth vs. Cena didn't end with a unification of the WWE championship and US championship. Carlito & Primo Vs Miz & Morrison, WM 25HHH Vs Kane, No Mercy 2002 Melina Vs Layla, Night of Champions 2010 Cena Vs Orton, TLC 2013 Need I go on? Okay but I literally gave you an example where that didn't happen.... so? You said "every". You were wrong. Fine. ALMOST every time. Happy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bushy. Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Beth looks the exact same lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmerc Posted April 2, 2019 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Lmao Beth opened the ropes for Nattie to just go under the bottom rope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bushy. Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Brock ain't even looking too big these days. He never does before his matches. Hell probably jam needles in his eyelids right before Mania starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Coco Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Skinny Nia (Peyton), Chubby Nia (Tamina) and Obese Nia (Nia) all on the same team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Vercetti Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Beth tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmerc Posted April 2, 2019 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Skinny Nia (Peyton), Chubby Nia (Tamina) and Obese Nia (Nia) all on the same team. wot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EJ! Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Winner-takes-all =/= unificationIt's where WWE goes 99.999999% of the time though.Im not seeing it this time.I am. And even if they don't unify one will have to play second fiddle to the other. It's a shitty situation no matter what way you look at it.It is dumb and maybe Im being foolishly optimistic but I can easily see the winner losing one of the belts to shenanigans, especially with no rematch clause.When though? RAW the next night? Great another one day title run. A few months down the line? We have a second fiddle situation, plus if you win one belt why shouldn't you get the other too? If we believe that Charlotte won that match simply to cut the SDL Womens title match off from Mania, making the main event winner-takes-all just makes it less confusing and is better than that title not being on the line at all. Then it would really look like a second fiddle title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willows Way Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Beth looking great tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bushy. Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 Skinny Nia (Peyton), Chubby Nia (Tamina) and Obese Nia (Nia) all on the same team. I reread this like 5 times and I still dont get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Coco Posted April 2, 2019 Report Share Posted April 2, 2019 That's my Glamazon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.