Generations Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 If anything, they'll divert NASA spending into military funding and NASA will have valuable resources wasted on shit we never needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango kid Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 If anything, they'll divert NASA spending into military funding and NASA will have valuable resources wasted on shit we never needed. . Again you can't say is never needed everything is not needed until it's needed he'll NASA's barely staying afloat as it is after Obama cut pretty much all of NASA'sfunding America's falling behind when it comes to space travel with China Russian becoming leaders if this is a way to even the playing field I'm all for it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 Obama did not cut Nasa's funding. What are you even on about? Seriously...stop posting nonsense. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_policy_of_the_Barack_Obama_administration Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Imperio Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 Austin been playing too much infinite warfare Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AONO. Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 It's a sixth branch of United States Armed Forces Austin... it's that simple. It's not exploration it's militarization. One of characteristics of good ol' fascism. And not with a smiley face anymore either... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango kid Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 Obama did not cut Nasa's funding. What are you even on about? Seriously...stop posting nonsense. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_policy_of_the_Barack_Obama_administration http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/322918-how-barack-obama-ruined-nasa-space-exploration What you think just because it's militarization they won't be exploring either what made you think they won't Obama did not cut Nasa's funding. What are you even on about? Seriously...stop posting nonsense. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_policy_of_the_Barack_Obama_administration http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/322918-how-barack-obama-ruined-nasa-space-exploration What you think just because it's militarization they won't be exploring either what made you think they won't https://www.space.com/14544-president-obama-nasa-budget-2013.html https://www.universetoday.com/127309/nasa-2017-budget/ Say what you want but Obama's are reason companies like SpaceX is doing the space exploration heavy lifting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 A biased article titled "How Obama ruined space exploration", from 'The Hill'... Yeah...I'm gonna pass on that highly accredited "source". Point is, you claimed he cut funding to NASA, and he didn't. I'm not here to discuss whether you think Obama's NASA was a success or not. Only two things are relevant. 1) You were full of shit when you said what you said. 2) A military branch will "explore space" for military purposes only. How many reports does the public get about the "exploration" that military units do on the ground or the sea? None? Okay then. A military space branch will seek ways to utilize space travel for military application. They don't give a shit about anything that falls outside of that. Satellites will be a large part of this. That controversial Google program probably has something to do with this also. Republicans talk so much bullshit about big brother watching us, and they love shit like this. Mind-boggling. Also such a shame that NASA was in shambles under Obama and couldn't perform that Mars landing for the Curiousity rover. I was really looking forward to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango kid Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 A biased article titled "How Obama ruined space exploration", from 'The Hill'... Yeah...I'm gonna pass on that highly accredited "source". Point is, you claimed he cut funding to NASA, and he didn't. I'm not here to discuss whether you think Obama's NASA was a success or not. Only two things are relevant. 1) You were full of shit when you said what you said. 2) A military branch will "explore space" for military purposes only. How many reports does the public get about the "exploration" that military units do on the ground or the sea? None? Okay then. A military space branch will seek ways to utilize space travel for military application. They don't give a shit about anything that falls outside of that. Satellites will be a large part of this. That controversial Google program probably has something to do with this also. Republicans talk so much bullshit about big brother watching us, and they love shit like this. Mind-boggling. OIC if it's bashes Obama and it's an article about Obama it's wrong but if they do it with Trump it's right I see I posted more than one the last space shuttle launch from NASA happen in 2011 NASA hasn't launched anything into space after that whether you like to believe it or not Obama killed NASA But of course if that article said Trump kill NASA you agree with it But the fact of the matter is you're wrong because there's plenty of articles stating that Obama cut funding to NASA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 You know what...I'm not arguing with you. You don't want to listen to common sense shit. And you're full of nonsense. These aren't opinions. A military branch is a military branch. Obama did not cut NASA funding. Period. He also promoted an environment where SpaceX could thrive. Those are facts. And I have never posted a single article that is actually anti-Trump in the title. That's bullshit. I don't read articles like that...because they're *censored*ing garbage. I post plenty of articles that are anti-Trump in the body of the text, but only through the reporting of actual negative shit that Trump has done...never taking a blatantly one-sided stance in the headline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M3J Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 On the immigration thing.... Yeah, it's pretty disgusting to see how Trump and his administration are handling this thing. Trumps obnoxious tweets, and Sanders "handling" the attacks and continuing to shifting the blame on Democrats. Jesus *censored*ing christ if you really wanna "stick it to them" and show yourself in good light, then you should fix what nobody has fixed for a decade? But no, you need your idiotic wall, and continue with nonsense immigration policy. Of course politicians were doing whatever for the longest time, but come on... this is a new level of disgusting. Shouldn't the priority be on FIXING THE PROBLEM? "But.. but... but... they didit too!" Nope, not like this. And I rarely write things like this on here really...But damn, wake the *Censored* up, they are torturing kids, and freaking lie. It was their decision, in the present. Sessions announced this policy almost two months ago. And no, things weren't like this before. On a side note... It's so creppy watching Sanders even more now. And I don't believe that she hasn't got a problem with what she is saying and who and what she is defending. Everyday she looks more uncomfortable... I kinda feel bad for her. Maybe. I'm sure Sanders doesn't care about what she's saying as long as she's being paid. I find it hard to feel bad for someone who's openly lying to the public when she could step down or tell the truth, if not refuse to lie anyway. She's honestly just as responsible as anyone else in the republican party for all the bullshit that's going on. Remember when Trump said he was joking about a space military branch? What happened to that only being a joke? Accompanied by this perfect photo of Trump being presented an astronaut toy: Wonder who convinced him to fund that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 You know what...I'm not arguing with you. You don't want to listen to common sense shit. And you're full of nonsense. These aren't opinions. A military branch is a military branch. Obama did not cut NASA funding. Period. He also promoted an environment where SpaceX could thrive. Those are facts. Again Obama cutting funding is already been proven true again your Trump blinders are on so you don't want to listen to anyone that I have the same mindset as you it's a known fact that Obama kill NASA You aren't even saying things that are true. Nothing has been "proven" at all. NASA didn't fold under Obama, and plenty of advances have been made in the space program. You can't just say shit that you want to be true, accompanied by half-assed tabloid reports. I know you Trump types typically don't give a shit about science, but plenty of scientific research came from NASA under Obama. Just because we didn't waste trillions to walk on the moon again doesn't mean shit. What do you want, space rocks and color television? Get lost, man. There's more to space funding than moon landings and freeze-dried ice cream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AONO. Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 Obama cut it. But he actually had a strategy and tried to modify projects that had to do with exploration, technological research and commercial flights. And NASA was in a bad state even before Obama... Its not just about pumping dollars... Trump however did double damage and cut it even more without any plan or strategy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 Actual science > putting flags on space rocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M3J Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 So, can anyone tell me how Hillary would be worse than Trump? Trump basically divided our country in a possibly irreparable way, does some shit, says dumb shit, and hires dumb shits. Had Trump not talked shit about immigrants/illegal immigration, I'm sure very few people would have been aware of ICE's horrible ways. If Hillary kept barking on about illegal immigration being bad, more people would learn about ICE and condemn her for it. And then you have the right even further dividing USA with their bumper stickers, Facebook posts and comments, books, and all that shit attacking liberals, left, and democrats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango kid Posted June 19, 2018 Report Share Posted June 19, 2018 Well no cuz Hillary would never put in that spot the reason Hillary didn't win was simple when the whatever his name was FBI agent came out and the emails came out that made everyone remember that Hillary was part of the old corrupt politician But would she be worse that's really hard to know and say I think she would have been just as bad as Trump but unlike Trump wouldnt be so public about it I'll be more the behind closed doors type stuff with Trump it's more public that what Hillary would have done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernez Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 So, can anyone tell me how Hillary would be worse than Trump? Trump basically divided our country in a possibly irreparable way, does some shit, says dumb shit, and hires dumb shits. Had Trump not talked shit about immigrants/illegal immigration, I'm sure very few people would have been aware of ICE's horrible ways. If Hillary kept barking on about illegal immigration being bad, more people would learn about ICE and condemn her for it. And then you have the right even further dividing USA with their bumper stickers, Facebook posts and comments, books, and all that shit attacking liberals, left, and democrats. As much as I *censored*ing hate trump, I don't like when people say this. Hillary had a horrible record of doing shitty things and changing her mind on so many things. We will never know if Hillary would be worse or not. At this point, I don't even like to think of theorys. I want to think of solutions. All of us here that are in America and can vote needs to get together and vote for someone reasonable. It's the only chance we got at a better America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maskedmaniac Posted June 20, 2018 Author Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 Will the elections still be fair? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 We just gonna pretend that Trump didn't pull out of th UN Human Rights Council and then hug the US flag like a *Censored*? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M3J Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 So, can anyone tell me how Hillary would be worse than Trump? Trump basically divided our country in a possibly irreparable way, does some shit, says dumb shit, and hires dumb shits. Had Trump not talked shit about immigrants/illegal immigration, I'm sure very few people would have been aware of ICE's horrible ways. If Hillary kept barking on about illegal immigration being bad, more people would learn about ICE and condemn her for it. And then you have the right even further dividing USA with their bumper stickers, Facebook posts and comments, books, and all that shit attacking liberals, left, and democrats. As much as I *censored*ing hate trump, I don't like when people say this. Hillary had a horrible record of doing shitty things and changing her mind on so many things. We will never know if Hillary would be worse or not. At this point, I don't even like to think of theorys. I want to think of solutions. All of us here that are in America and can vote needs to get together and vote for someone reasonable. It's the only chance we got at a better America. THe thing is, she'd probably do something that's even remotely left leaning, which is good for the country, just to get reelected. I've no doubt she'd continue things like ICE, but at least she would probably be more humane and not separate kids from their parents, try to build a wall, or say stupid shit every single day. Problem is, what's gonna happen if we do get someone reasonable? We had Bernie, but people said he had no plan to get money for free education and shit or "waah socialism bad!" and voted for Hillary instead, or didn't vote at all. We had Hillary, but a lot of people believed lies about her or thought emails killed people they wouldn't care about otherwise, that it resulted in Trump's victory. Previous election should have taught us a lesson, but people are doomed to repeat history. I don't know if a better America is possible, honestly, at this point. We're so divided, and this past few years have showed us just how bad things really are. I mean, we had racists who were rioting to keep their racist Confederate statues, we have cops killing black people, and now we have a person associated with Trump mocking a girl with Down syndrome being separated from her parent/s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernez Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 Once again, you're talking hypothetical though. I don't see a point in talking like that...and even if the election ISN'T fair. At least we can all say we did SOMETHING to stop evil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 At least we can all say we did SOMETHING to stop evil. *Except for those who actively voted Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernez Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 At least we can all say we did SOMETHING to stop evil. *Except for those who actively voted Trump. I try to forget that people actually did that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango kid Posted June 20, 2018 Report Share Posted June 20, 2018 So Trump sign executive order to stop the separation of families the problem is now is how to return them all and find the families Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maskedmaniac Posted June 21, 2018 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2018 Probably shouldnt have separated them to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango kid Posted June 21, 2018 Report Share Posted June 21, 2018 I mean in a way I kind of understand it cuz technically the parents broke the law and if parents broke the law they go to jail u cant bring the kids to,jail with u and so they r separate from the kids But I guess the law does not affect kids already separated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.