Muur Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Which would you prefer? for me, I think I prefer 40, it's a better number and ever since the one with 40, I've felt like 30 isn't enough plus it limits the amount of pointless/quick entrants, so we can get more bigger ones. 5 1 min would have a big effect on a 30 man but a lesser on 40. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 I think you get too many jobbers in 40 man rumbles...but the current roster is definitely stacked. Factor in surprises, and I think you probably have a better time to do a 40 man rumble this year than any other year in the past...that said, I think a 30 man match is probably still for the best...unless they're going all-out with surprise entrants. If they have like...5 really big surprise entrants...then I think a 40 man rumble would be better. If not, then stick with 30. And the women should have a 20 woman rumble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeb ★ Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 40 man Rumble would be cool if executed right, with a number of surprise entrants like Gen said. 2011 Rumble's execution was eh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmerc Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 I wanted this years to be a 40 man. I think 30 is just short of enough so 40 is a good number, especially if there are stupid entrees like Primo and Epico lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil' Kazu Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Which would you prefer? for me, I think I prefer 40, it's a better number and ever since the one with 40, I've felt like 30 isn't enough plus it limits the amount of pointless/quick entrants, so we can get more bigger ones. 5 1 min would have a big effect on a 30 man but a lesser on 40. What a terrible thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crackalicious Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 30, all I see 40 now is so someone can throw more jobbers out to break the record. I don't even think jobbers should be in it, so 40 would just add more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willows Way Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 I say 30 cause 40 was just an addition of a shitload of jobbers. However that said i would like to see one more 40 man rumble these days since the roster is so big and good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVIP Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 It should be 40. With the ever expanding roster I think it makes sense. 30 men isn't enough anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Carlton Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Theres easily enough stars on the roster for a 40 man rumble, if you throw in a couple of the bigger NXT/Cruiserweight/UK stars, the part timers like Lesner, Goldberg etc plus a few surprise entrants too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 I'd like 40 but only if that means more surprises. That's why I was excited but then let down during the 2011 one, I mean Booker & Diesel were cool, but we usually get like two in a regular Rumble anyway. With 40, you could get 15 from each brand and then like 5 Legends and 5 NXT guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Vercetti Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 40. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Counting Lights Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 40 would definitely be better. The only reason the 2011 one was lackluster was because of New Nexus and then Cenaswoggle having these long intervals of running the thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faster Than Light Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 30 Quality over quantity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernez Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 I think you get too many jobbers in 40 man rumbles...but the current roster is definitely stacked. Factor in surprises, and I think you probably have a better time to do a 40 man rumble this year than any other year in the past...that said, I think a 30 man match is probably still for the best...unless they're going all-out with surprise entrants. If they have like...5 really big surprise entrants...then I think a 40 man rumble would be better. If not, then stick with 30. And the women should have a 20 woman rumble. Blah, I would hate rumbles with nothing but main eventers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miguelnuva Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 40 for me. We already have 15 announced entries last time I checked. with 40 they have more entires to give us suprises.l and I don't mind jobers in the Runble because they put them in anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
вlueprint Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Misusing some of the great talent during the rumble match is the only thing that will come of this. Hell WWE hasn't booked a good 30 man rumble in years besides last year's rumble. You think they are capable of doing that with 40? I don't see it at all. In fact, the winner of the first 40 man rumble ever should've given us a 92 Ric Flair ambience and it was the opposite. The majority of fans were livid because the winner didn't even have any highlight moments throughout the entire rumble match. On top of that he was a very late entry into the rumble so that killed all chances of even creating moments for himself to make his win much more memorable than a Booker T and Diesel return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey D. Jiggy Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 40, only if it means the Rumble lasts longer. Last time they did it, eliminations webt by so quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Almost Easy Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 I would rather have a very solid 30 man rumble, than a 40 man rumble with lower midcarders and jobbers. Seeing Jey Uso (for example) enter the Rumble, you know fine well that Jimmy Uso is going to be in it. But when Jimmy hasn't entered, and there are like 3 more entrants, it kind of kills the surprise, as you can begin to guess who is left. I'd rather it was just singles wrestlers, the odd return, and a few NXT wrestlers, but keep it 30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dje_wba Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 30 Quality over quantity Hit the nail on the head. 40 is too bloated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHavoc Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Considering the roster is pretty huge I would say 40.. I mean you can fill a Royal Rumble with the Raw roster alone.. And when you don't do that,some guys that are upper midcarders are gonna play second fidle to some main eventers like Lesnar and Goldberg even though they don't deserve that treatment.Like staying in the Rumble for only 2 minutes then get eliminated cause you can't have 10 men in the ring at the same time and someone has to look strong with 5 or 6 eliminations.It is happening every year and I am afraid it's gonna happen again this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creepia Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 40. Put in a lot of jobbers? Oh no how dare they give everyone on their roster a main event spot for one night of the year. You know that they're not going to win? How about just enjoy seeing them for once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy. Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 30. 40 is overkill and gives them added incentive to have factions dominate in the match, which I absolutely despise (one of the main reasons 2011's RR match sucked balls). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil' Kazu Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 40. Put in a lot of jobbers? Oh no how dare they give everyone on their roster a main event spot for one night of the year. You know that they're not going to win? How about just enjoy seeing them for once. How about you stop telling people what to like? wtf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Hell Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Definately 40, especially with all the talent that have been signed recently (cruiserweights, UK, etc). Also I can never get enough of Royal Rumble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creepia Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 40. Put in a lot of jobbers? Oh no how dare they give everyone on their roster a main event spot for one night of the year. You know that they're not going to win? How about just enjoy seeing them for once. How about you stop telling people what to like? wtf How about it was a suggestion and not a command ... I know that's crazy right Tell me where I told people what to like. Go on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.