Jump to content

WWE Show Discussion


Jeb ★

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I like CM Punk, but he shouldn't be anywhere near a Mt. Rushmore. Especially not over Ric Flair or Undertaker

Why them though? The wrestlers I included helped WWE stay afloat and become even bigger. I could be wrong though, but I've never seen WWE or anyone mention how Ric and Taker helped make WWE even bigger like Hogan and Austin did. And I love Taker.

 

 

 

Remove Punk, M3J, and we've got a perfect Mt. Rushmore for WWF right there. Yes I said WWF for a reason.

But I'm taking WWE's history into account, and how each wrestler helped it gain more recognition. Didn't Punk get WWE mainstream attention with his pipebomb? If the best of WWE is included, Punk wouldn't even be on there, while Shawn and Taker would easily make the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...