Mango kid Posted April 16, 2014 Report Share Posted April 16, 2014 TNA Impact Graphics can't be beat by WWE. http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mc0bl5SqQF1qlhou3o1_500.png i hate when people do this u cant compare to u Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECWDanSelby Posted April 16, 2014 Report Share Posted April 16, 2014 /\ There's so much wrong with that sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango kid Posted April 16, 2014 Report Share Posted April 16, 2014 no there not how can u compare a game that took years to make to a game that only has a year to make Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dangerous Dancing Dan Posted April 16, 2014 Report Share Posted April 16, 2014 no there not how can u compare a game that took years to make to a game that only has a year to make You can't spell you. I think that's what he was talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chazzle. Posted April 16, 2014 Report Share Posted April 16, 2014 TNA Impact Graphics can't be beat by WWE. http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mc0bl5SqQF1qlhou3o1_500.png TNA Impact's models were scanned. WWE Games don't have that (Though seems like faces will be this year). TNA also wasn't made in a year. It wasn't even completely finished when it released. Plus the models in Impact were frozen. Their faces didn't move, their eyes didn't blink. That's terrible. Also, you've been told about hotlinking before. Hotlinking again will result in a warn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
★CrossRhodes★ Posted April 16, 2014 Report Share Posted April 16, 2014 TNA Impact Graphics can't be beat by WWE. http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mc0bl5SqQF1qlhou3o1_500.png They literally picked the worst model from wwe to show. And TNA's models had no life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crack. Posted April 16, 2014 Report Share Posted April 16, 2014 TNA's overrated emotionless ass robotic models They look like moving pictures Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R A T E D. Posted April 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 I went along and made another video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPiqZm4UvyE&feature=youtu.be This time with the only entrance that never changed throughout the years (which is a good thing for me). And I turned off the lighting on each entrance on purpose. Actually except for SvR07, I forgot that was slightly different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarGreymon77 Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 I always think about SvR 2006 when I think about the best character models, but 2007 certainly had the best CAW faces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickRedMachine Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 I don't mind the graphics really (in any game), but some of the models are just sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eclipsedj3di Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 Am I the only one who noticed that this is 08? Come on people.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crack. Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 What are you talking about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M J Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 Knew the hate would come soon as a tna pic was shown. Take it out of contex for a moment on paper shown above graphics look wise (pic) should be aimed to look like that on next gen. On paper the booker T tna pisses over the SD version and so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crack. Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 TNA's character models look like moving pictures. No emotion or nothing. They don't feel alive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M J Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 Dude take out of contex for min we talking nex gen should look like that pic above (booker T) and also have emotion/alive. Regardless, the pic pisses over any wrestling game IMAGE I've seem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam the d00d Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 I think the problem with the game up until like 2011 was that the lighting was so dim and shit. I feel like graphically 2011 is maybe the best. I never played 2012 but judging from that video it looks like the worst of the bunch graphically. I can't see much of a difference between 2011, 2013, and 2014. 2007-2010 are a bit of an eye sore to me in hindsight. Something just seems really flat, dull, and lifeless about their graphics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dangerous Dancing Dan Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 TNA had sweat in it while WWE Games never have sweat in any of their games. Sure the gameplay is bad but I think they did the better GRAPHICS better then WWE's 30 Years. Also remember it was TNA's first tried at making a video game. Do you remember the first WWF Video game on Nintendo? It's awful and it has the worse graphics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ǝpitome Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 Cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crack. Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 TNA had sweat in it while WWE Games never have sweat in any of their games. Sure the gameplay is bad but I think they did the better GRAPHICS better then WWE's 30 Years. Also remember it was TNA's first tried at making a video game. Do you remember the first WWF Video game on Nintendo? It's awful and it has the worse graphics. They had sweat in SVR 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anno Domini. Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 Knew the hate would come soon as a tna pic was shown. Take it out of contex for a moment on paper shown above graphics look wise (pic) should be aimed to look like that on next gen. On paper the booker T tna pisses over the SD version and so far. On paper it works, but that don't mean shit if it doesn't work in action. It's not hate if the criticism is well-founded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OJ Simpson Posted April 21, 2014 Report Share Posted April 21, 2014 It's give and take. I think '07's models are better, but the movement wasn't fluid. I heard someone say WWE '12's lighting was good. I disagree. That game was lifeless and desaturated. To me the closest they've come to hitting the sweet spot was SVR '11, but the gameplay was bad. The main thing to remember with the later thing was the budget issue as THQ was going out of business. I think we'll see a a major leap this year as far as graphics because of 2K having the game from start to finish and the next generation game system leap. I can't see the graphics staying the way they are for 2k15. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maskedmaniac Posted April 21, 2014 Report Share Posted April 21, 2014 The TNA models may have looked "lifeless" but at least it looked like them. Why would I want a Booker T the likes of WWE '12, flowing locks and all, if he looked like a horse-faced caramel man.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarGreymon77 Posted April 21, 2014 Report Share Posted April 21, 2014 I think the Booker T criticism probably had something to do with him not being in 2k14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crack. Posted April 21, 2014 Report Share Posted April 21, 2014 I think the Booker T criticism probably had something to do with him not being in 2k14. What, nah it started way before that, he was light skinned on WWE '12 and looked like a donkey and then they fixed his skin color on WWE '13 and he still looked like a donkey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarGreymon77 Posted April 21, 2014 Report Share Posted April 21, 2014 I think the Booker T criticism probably had something to do with him not being in 2k14. What, nah it started way before that, he was light skinned on WWE '12 and looked like a donkey and then they fixed his skin color on WWE '13 and he still looked like a donkey They finally decided they didn't know how to fix him for the time being, so they said *Censored* it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.