HopesAnchor131 Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 What has happened to CAWs, this place is more like a porn site now with all the half naked women in everyone's avatars/signatures. Not saying I have a problem with it but you guys say yourself in the rules that little kids use the forum too, surely it shouldn't be something they are seeing? This place has changed a lot in the 7 years I have been here. Just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chazzle. Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 Images of divas are allowed as long as private areas are not shown. There's nothing wrong with them. If Private areas are shown, they will be removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuicidalKissesProduction™ Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 I'm supposing you are referring to these users signatures; http://caws.ws/forum/user/8711-crack/ http://caws.ws/forum/user/44754-paulie-walnuts/ "No Adult Material You are not allowed to post references, links or images to any sort of adult material or pornography. Images of divas are allowed as long as private areas are not shown." I suppose none of these are breaking rules by these guidelines; then again. "Other Explicit ContentExplicit images/videos, which include but are not limited to death scenes, death pictures, torture, mutilation and human faeces, are not allowed. Explicit written descriptions of these acts is also not allowed." Is also on the list; yet we've had 'Suicide' Videos posted in the Discussion forms and disturbing music videos of Mutilation/torture also in the Discussion forums. So it's up to the Mods entirely... Also; "No Illegal Activities We have a strict policy against piracy, streams, console hacking, ROMs, mods, and the illegal use of copyrighted material. We do not allow linking to or giving information about any site that distributes illegal software or provides unlicensed streams, console hacks, ROMs, copyrighted media, emulators or which seeks help circumvent any copyright laws." This rule is also outdated being as CAWs.ws allows Mods/Hacking to occur since THQ is now longer the publisher of the game. Or am I incorrect on this point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulie Walnuts Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 Lmao. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crack. Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 Lmao. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy. Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 The OP doesn't dig bitches it seems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muur Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 If the rule says "Images of divas are allowed as long as private areas are not shown." then does that technical mean that non divas aren't allowed on avys!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undercard Jamoke Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 Lmao. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuicidalKissesProduction™ Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 Lmao. Lmao. The OP doesn't dig bitches it seems. Lmao. Trolls, Trolls all around us...Was any of this necessary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undercard Jamoke Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 On a serious note if he does not want to see certain signatures or avatars of certain users he could ignore them using the ignore feature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poe Øhlin Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 On a serious note if he does not want to see certain signatures or avatars of certain users he could ignore them using the ignore feature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNFNS Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 I'll make sure to tell them to put dudes in bikinis as their avy, would that be better? Or still too pornographic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuicidalKissesProduction™ Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 On a serious note if he does not want to see certain signatures or avatars of certain users he could ignore them using the ignore feature. On a serious note if he does not want to see certain signatures or avatars of certain users he could ignore them using the ignore feature. Ignoring someone just because of their signature that may or may not be against the guideline rules... bit of a stretch don't cha' think? I'll make sure to tell them to put dudes in bikinis as their avy, would that be better? Or still too pornographic? Making this entire thing a whole lot better aren't you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poe Øhlin Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 On a serious note if he does not want to see certain signatures or avatars of certain users he could ignore them using the ignore feature. On a serious note if he does not want to see certain signatures or avatars of certain users he could ignore them using the ignore feature. Ignoring someone just because of their signature that may or may not be against the guideline rules... bit of a stretch don't cha' think? I'll make sure to tell them to put dudes in bikinis as their avy, would that be better? Or still too pornographic? Making this entire thing a whole lot better aren't you... Well you can always just set it to ignore a person's signature. As simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulie Walnuts Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 Lmao. Lmao. The OP doesn't dig bitches it seems. Lmao. Trolls, Trolls all around us...Was any of this necessary? Wait..So we're trolls because we find this thread hilarious? The fact of the matter is, if any of these sigs were against the rules, they would've been removed. They aren't. I've had this sig for months, obviously it isn't against any board policy. Where's the privates being shown? You don't see her breasts, you don't see vagina, you don't even get a good glimpse of her ass, which nowadays isn't exactly considered a private area anyway by people of maturity. You see her back, the top of her arm, and some thigh. There's nothing in my sig or Crack's that violates board policy. And clearly.... I'd like to know what exactly is pornographic about the female indy wrestler in my signature.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNFNS Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 On a serious note if he does not want to see certain signatures or avatars of certain users he could ignore them using the ignore feature. On a serious note if he does not want to see certain signatures or avatars of certain users he could ignore them using the ignore feature. Ignoring someone just because of their signature that may or may not be against the guideline rules... bit of a stretch don't cha' think? I'll make sure to tell them to put dudes in bikinis as their avy, would that be better? Or still too pornographic? Making this entire thing a whole lot better aren't you... That's what I do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuicidalKissesProduction™ Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 I'd like to know what exactly is pornographic about the female indy wrestler in my signature.. I'll give you a tip, do a backwards Google Image search of your signature; you'll be surprised what you'll find in the exact same image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulie Walnuts Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 Lol, the original image still doesn't show anything pornographic. Fact is, if the sig violated rules, it'd be removed, it ain't. Get over it, and move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Intentz™ Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 From what I can see this topic was a genuine question that has turned into people trying to cause trouble. Fact is none of these images are violating any rules but it's not an easy decision to make, especially when it's on the borderline...(what's acceptable and what isn't). So we tend to review the image (if reported) and decide then and there if it crosses the borderline. It's easy if it quite clearly does. But most of the time it isn't as clear as black and white. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faster Than Light Posted June 29, 2013 Report Share Posted June 29, 2013 So yeah, with that closing. Thanks for the show of concern though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.