JGPLX. Posted February 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2013 Rain Man is a boring film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam the d00d Posted February 4, 2013 Report Share Posted February 4, 2013 POTC as movies are below average. But Captain Jack Sparrow as a character That I agree with. Would rather see 90 minute simple little adventure serial-esque films with the character than the big long epics the Pirates of the Carribean were made to be. One thing I gotta give those films credit for is the score. An amazing and memorable score like that is a rare thing in a lot of modern movies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyriqz ✪ Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 I thought Kick-Ass was an awesome film. Scott Pilgrim was great too. Both pretty unique. Aren't these popular? I liked both of them aswell, especially Scott Pilgrim was a lot of fun to watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kman Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 I don't know if its been said but Heath Ledger is not the best Joker of all time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shogun Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 you all remember Usual Suspects, right? Remember that tall guy, the one who mumbles? Yeah I think he's overrated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion™ Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 I don't know if its been said but Heath Ledger is not the best Joker of all time. No. No. No. He. Is. No. Doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chips. Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 I don't blame him for not thinking Heath Ledger is the best because Jack Nicholson was brilliant as well as Joker and stole the show. But I still liked Ledger more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twiztid Kratos Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 Two different jokers. Jacks was classic Joker, Ledger was Alan Moores joker. Period Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Evil Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 I think the argument lays more in which interpretation of the Joker's character did you enjoy more, not really who played him, as they both were perfect for their roles. I guarantee that an in his prime Nicholson could have played TDK's Joker just as good as Ledger did, if not better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion™ Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 I think the argument lays more in which interpretation of the Joker's character did you enjoy more, not really who played him, as they both were perfect for their roles. I guarantee that an in his prime Nicholson could have played TDK's Joker just as good as Ledger did, if not better. In my opinion Ledger did a better job being that Joker. That Joker character is better though. Nicholson did an excellent job as well. George Clooney was the best Batman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chips. Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 ^ That must be a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twiztid Kratos Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 I think the argument lays more in which interpretation of the Joker's character did you enjoy more, not really who played him, as they both were perfect for their roles. I guarantee that an in his prime Nicholson could have played TDK's Joker just as good as Ledger did, if not better. In my opinion Ledger did a better job being that Joker. That Joker character is better though. Nicholson did an excellent job as well. George Clooney was the best Batman. ''A better job being that joker'' would mean that Jack AND Heath were portraying the same joker, when they clearly did not. As I stated, Jacks joker was influenced by the classic version, Heaths was (And he ADMITTED this) was influenced by The Killing Joke, which was written by Alan Moore. Two different jokers, two different era, two different interpretations. It ONLY comes down to which you liked more, not as in a comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kman Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 Mark Hamill will always be Joker imo, his voice IS The Joker. I loved Heath Ledgers portrayal aswell as Jacks btw. Also, George Clooney was terrible, he played himself in that movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slevin. Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 Mark Hamill will always be Joker imo, his voice IS The Joker. I loved Heath Ledgers portrayal aswell as Jacks btw. Also, George Clooney was terrible, he played himself in that movie. Yes. Despite Heath's and Jack's great portrayals of the Joker character, Mark Hamill's voice will always be #1. Everything just fits nicely, especially the laugh <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poe Øhlin Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 Mark Hamill will always be Joker imo, his voice IS The Joker. I loved Heath Ledgers portrayal aswell as Jacks btw. Also, George Clooney was terrible, he played himself in that movie. Yes. Despite Heath's and Jack's great portrayals of the Joker character, Mark Hamill's voice will always be #1. Everything just fits nicely, especially the laugh <3 This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion™ Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 In my opinion, I loved Clooney as Batman. Maybe Christian Bale did better, but he'd be the only one close. And Keaton sucked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twiztid Kratos Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 The Fast and the Furious series is overrated as F**k and beyond Michelle Rodriguez, I have NO reason to watch them. (I just watch her clips online) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OK® Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 The Fast and the Furious series is overrated as F**k and beyond Michelle Rodriguez, I have NO reason to watch them. (I just watch her clips online) Agreed 100%, also way too unrealistic imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chips. Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 In my opinion, I loved Clooney as Batman. Maybe Christian Bale did better, but he'd be the only one close. And Keaton sucked. Clooney was the worst. Both Keaton and Val Kilmer were a lot better. Christian Bale is the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Evil Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 Keaton > Bale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chips. Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 Fast and Furious series also isn't rated very high at all. The only great one was the last one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion™ Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 The Lord of the Rings movies are terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyriqz ✪ Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 I'd agree with that but then again, I just saw 30 minutes of one of them and thought it was boring as *Censored*. Never bothered with the rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JGPLX. Posted February 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 Paths of Glory is Stanley Kubrick's best film by far. Megan is Missing is the best horror film ever. Christopher Nolan is NOT overrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam the d00d Posted February 7, 2013 Report Share Posted February 7, 2013 The Lord of the Rings movies are terrible. How so? I'd agree with that but then again, I just saw 30 minutes of one of them and thought it was boring as *Censored*. Never bothered with the rest. What do you expect in the first 30 minutes? It opens up with an action scene of a huge battle. Then it sets up the story in the Shire. What not enough action or what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.