drcat123 Posted February 23, 2010 Report Share Posted February 23, 2010 According to a report by The Figure Four Weekly Newsletter, financials for Southpeak Interactive show the amount spent on intellectual property licenses from July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 as $0. This means, unless the figures were not reported, that they acquired the license for the TNA Impact video game for free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Cena Posted February 24, 2010 Report Share Posted February 24, 2010 Don't see how this proves anything.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vickshow Posted February 26, 2010 Report Share Posted February 26, 2010 Yea just because they got the license for free doesn't prove at all that it was a bad game. So quit hating, this game was actually fun for a playthrough of career mode, then some exhibition to unlock the different moves and characters. Sure it wasn't the deepest game out there but if you take it at face value, they gave you a pretty decent game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SniperOps Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 People still hate on this game lolol. It's like hating on some random game that wasn't big from like 1997 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honor Posted August 8, 2010 Report Share Posted August 8, 2010 [quote name='Your Evil Hero' timestamp='1267250282' post='7117382'] People still hate on this game lolol. It's like hating on some random game that wasn't big from like 1997 [/quote] Yeah... and? It was so hyped up before release, and ended up being a total suckfest. You act like there's huge reasons to praise this game. The fact is this game was made in [b]2008[/b] by a somewhat respectable game company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Moose Posted August 22, 2010 Report Share Posted August 22, 2010 A somewhat respectable BANKRUPT company. It was rushed, end of story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RVD 4:20 Posted August 22, 2010 Report Share Posted August 22, 2010 [quote name='Monotastic Righ?' timestamp='1267000080' post='7110326'] Don't see how this proves anything.. [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SniperOps Posted August 25, 2010 Report Share Posted August 25, 2010 [quote name='ZackAttackâ„¢' timestamp='1281260107' post='7465345'] [quote name='Your Evil Hero' timestamp='1267250282' post='7117382'] People still hate on this game lolol. It's like hating on some random game that wasn't big from like 1997 [/quote] Yeah... and? It was so hyped up before release, and ended up being a total suckfest. You act like there's huge reasons to praise this game. The fact is this game was made in [b]2008[/b] by a somewhat respectable game company. [/quote] Little late here but... No I was acting like we shouldn't be shitting on a game that came out in 2008 when Midway was going bankrupt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honor Posted August 26, 2010 Report Share Posted August 26, 2010 [quote name='Your Evil Hero' timestamp='1282723279' post='7511486'] [quote name='ZackAttackâ„¢' timestamp='1281260107' post='7465345'] [quote name='Your Evil Hero' timestamp='1267250282' post='7117382'] People still hate on this game lolol. It's like hating on some random game that wasn't big from like 1997 [/quote] Yeah... and? It was so hyped up before release, and ended up being a total suckfest. You act like there's huge reasons to praise this game. The fact is this game was made in [b]2008[/b] by a somewhat respectable game company. [/quote] Little late here but... No I was acting like we shouldn't be shitting on a game that came out in 2008 when Midway was going bankrupt. [/quote] Meh, at least it was somewhat playable. I remember them confirming thousands of moves beforehand, and then just wow.... when it came out I was just so unimpressed with the lack of content. What was there was a bit fluid though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazman™ Posted August 26, 2010 Report Share Posted August 26, 2010 Yeah that doesn't prove anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domination. Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 duznt prove anything thq went bust 2daii svr 2011 is crap thts basically sayin this isnt it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honor Posted August 31, 2010 Report Share Posted August 31, 2010 [quote name='Kie.Arsenal1' timestamp='1283120451' post='7522702'] duznt prove anything thq went bust 2daii svr 2011 is crap thts basically sayin this isnt it [/quote] I can't fully read what you're trying to say, but if it's what I think it is, you fail. miserably. TNA game = No Morphing, promised 2000 moves, gave like 20. Story mode lacked any real depth, and was terribly boring. Tag teams looked like 'tards on the apron, and lacked any real movement. The best part of the TNA game was pressing the eject button to take the game out. SvR 2011 = Plethora of content, first batch of DLC free, hundreds of new moves, RtWm, Story designer, highlight reel, titantron maker, create-a-finisher, etc. Pretty much make any wrestler : past, present, and future. tons of parts and tattoos, etc. to make your character as original as possible. Paint tool for added customization. Even if THQ went bankrupt, which they won't any time soon, the SvR series would still destroy TNA iMPACT with RtWM alone. So no, that's why it isn't like that, at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nWo_Kevin Posted September 1, 2010 Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 SD Vs Raw 10 was decent, SD Vs Raw 11 looks really great but I have to say 08 and 09 was garbage from THQ. I enjoyed TNA's game over those 2 titles. But you cant compared SD Vs Raw 11 which is like the 12th? title in the series. To the first ever game TNA made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion™ Posted September 5, 2010 Report Share Posted September 5, 2010 You guys argue about dumb shit get over the game. It was a lackluster game and poeple need to realized doexens of them come out a year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honor Posted September 7, 2010 Report Share Posted September 7, 2010 [quote name='nWo_Kevin' timestamp='1283357980' post='7530193'] SD Vs Raw 10 was decent, SD Vs Raw 11 looks really great but I have to say 08 and 09 was garbage from THQ. I enjoyed TNA's game over those 2 titles. [b]But you cant compared SD Vs Raw 11 which is like the 12th? title in the series. [/b]To the first ever game TNA made. [/quote] What Kie.Arsenal1 was saying is if THQ went Bankrupt, then we'd be saying SvR 11 is crap....which is a very different situation, therefore, a comparison would have to be made. Once compared, it would show that it, in fact, would NOT be the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CENATION NO.1 Posted January 17, 2011 Report Share Posted January 17, 2011 it was a good game but was not batter then SVR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.