Spleenishly-Green Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 It's ridiculous because, by the time Wrestlemania XXI had aired, The Undertaker's hair was at a longer length. Tell me what the hell THQ/Yukes might have been thinking when they had decided not to give him long hair on WWE Smackdown vs. Raw 2006! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tupacfan Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 who gives a flyin its just hair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jαyson Voorhees Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 Well they say every year they work harder on the game, I guess they were slacking back then, no surprise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spleenishly-Green Posted May 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 [quote name='2pac' post='4256671' date='May 11 2008, 03:45 PM']who gives a flyin its just hair[/quote] It's just not the same. I know it just seems like merely an aestethic and cosmetic issue. But, that's always been a pet peeve, to me. Unless he's The American Badass, then "NOT" having the long hair he had by the time Wrestlemania 21 had aired is just nagging, to me. It's one of the few complaints I have about this game. Plus, I used up all of the CAW Slots so I can't create or copy myself a CAW of Undertaker in this modern day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edge_sucks Posted August 12, 2008 Report Share Posted August 12, 2008 Well I went searching for some videos of him in 05 and he was actually growing his hair back from his Big Evil Era and the SVR games are made a year before so his hair was still growin back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.