CROSS-Out

Just like the WWE to toss away potential because they're too foolish to see it.

What does that have to do with anything? I know I sound like a broken record a spiritual successor is NOT the same thing as a sequel. Otherwise everyone had better be calling Dragon Age: Origins, Baldurs Gate 3.

It is would u consider gta 3 4 5 sequels Because GTA 3 was made by a different company right? Oh wait, it wasn't? They were all made by the same guys and a continuation of the themes presented by the series? Shocker.

Austin logic terrifies me. "who cares if people think the holocaust didn't happen, let them!" "who cares if people think the earth is flat, let them!" "who cares if people think 2 plus 2 is 353, let them!".

it would be 3 it like gta just a numbering system Reread what I said, its not a *censored*ing difficult concept to grasp. Everything's a *censored*ing difficult concept to grasp for that boi Preach it!

it would be 3 it like gta just a numbering system Reread what I said, its not a *censored*ing difficult concept to grasp.

It was a wild west game. That's kind of to be expected.

Not bad. I mean, I kind of expected it to be bigger than the previous map, it'd probably have to be, but still very nice. Also, seriously, its not goddamn Red Dead 3. Red Dead Redemption was the spiritual successor, NOT sequel, to Revolver. That'd be like saying Dark Souls is Demons Souls 2, or that Demons Souls is the latest Kings Field game, that's not how it works.

Not bad, far more colorful than I imagined it'd be.

Interesting, will check it out some time.

Data East? As in, the guys who made Joe and Mac? Huh. I should check that out.

Yes please. Sure its a walking mountain of cliches nowadays, but it was fun as hell back in the day.

Yeah I want this. 3 characters was cool for GTA V, but I don't want RDR2 to follow that. If they are doing multiple characters I would like two; outlaw and lawman. Have the story connect them and intertwine, but still remain independent. The possibilities are great. Perhaps take a page out of Call Of Juarez' book, and have the lawman chasing the outlaw throughout the game, and have each of them good at different things. ... In fact, can we just get a Call Of Juarez remake as well?

I'd say let them attack any group they want, but have some kind of penalty if you attack the wrong group. Attack your own kind and the response be severe.

I can see the multiple playable characters being a cool idea IF they try to differentiate them a bit more. Have one be a lawman and another be an outlaw for instance.

The bigfoot mission was, indeed, really well done. And funny, surprisingly. Marstons lines could get a laugh out of me at the same time I feel terrible for doing it all.

Undead Nightmare was freaking awesome. and both legitimately funny and legitimately unnerving at times.

No. Red Dead Redemption is the spiritual successor, NOT a full-on sequel. It was the start of a new franchise that its basis on a previous game with a few references, it is not a sequel to it. Nobody called Dragon Age "Baldurs Gate 3".

.... YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Shadow Warrior (the newer one). The sword combat is brilliant.

Keep jumping between Civ V: BNW, EA Sports UFC, and Witcher 3.

Are you just talking normal chat, or does that include whispers and group chat? Normal chat. I didn't try the others. Ahh okay. I could understand the loss of normal chat, but group and whisper tends to be important in MMOs, even for younglings.

Are you just talking normal chat, or does that include whispers and group chat?