Generations Posted January 16, 2019 Report Share Posted January 16, 2019 Discuss: First teaser: Full trailer (December 2019): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeM Posted January 16, 2019 Report Share Posted January 16, 2019 I'm intrigued. And not a little excited. Although to be honest, I think the videogame (so far, mine keeps crashing after the Librarian) is a worthy "Ghostbusters III" I hope this has Dan Akroyd, Ernie Hudson and Bill Murray in it (we miss you Egon) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNX Posted January 17, 2019 Report Share Posted January 17, 2019 I thought that's even why they did the game to begin with. It was supposed to be like the third movie. Wtf is this even? I never got to see the remake. Not looking forward to that either. If Dan is attached, I'm game. Otherwise it's a dice roll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeM Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 One little tiny nitpick, if this is supposed to follow on from the original Ghostbuster movies, then that really should be Ecto 1A and not Ecto 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted January 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 One little tiny nitpick, if this is supposed to follow on from the original Ghostbuster movies, then that really should be Ecto 1A and not Ecto 1. Part of the plate is obscured, so it still could be...even though the plate is obviously yellow, not white. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeM Posted January 24, 2019 Report Share Posted January 24, 2019 One little tiny nitpick, if this is supposed to follow on from the original Ghostbuster movies, then that really should be Ecto 1A and not Ecto 1. Part of the plate is obscured, so it still could be...even though the plate is obviously yellow, not white. True, Ecto 1A had the white plates front and back didn't it? I don't think it's tall enough for all the stuff on top of 1A either, of course that could have been stripped down as part of the rebuild. I do think it's gonna be Ray Stantz tinkering with the proton pack though, with Harold gone, he's the only one. Peter Venkman never showed any sort of technical aptitude before, neither did Winston. I can't imagine a proton pack and neutrino thrower is the sort of thing that anyone could pick up and put together. Ray would be the only one other than Egon that could do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Shades of Cool Posted January 24, 2019 Report Share Posted January 24, 2019 Looks kinda cool. I'd hope we'd get the original crew back though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeM Posted January 24, 2019 Report Share Posted January 24, 2019 Looks kinda cool. I'd hope we'd get the original crew back though. Three of them, at least. I doubt they could do a convincing job of getting Harold Ramis in there, and I'd suspect also that he wasn't working on it when he passed away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Shades of Cool Posted January 24, 2019 Report Share Posted January 24, 2019 Looks kinda cool. I'd hope we'd get the original crew back though. Three of them, at least. I doubt they could do a convincing job of getting Harold Ramis in there, and I'd suspect also that he wasn't working on it when he passed away. Well, that's what I meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNX Posted January 26, 2019 Report Share Posted January 26, 2019 I do think it's gonna be Ray Stantz tinkering with the proton pack though, with Harold gone, he's the only one. Peter Venkman never showed any sort of technical aptitude before, neither did Winston. I can't imagine a proton pack and neutrino thrower is the sort of thing that anyone could pick up and put together. Ray would be the only one other than Egon that could do it. He might've had a kid and taught her everything she knows. Or pull an extreme Ghostbusters kind of deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeM Posted February 16, 2019 Report Share Posted February 16, 2019 I do think it's gonna be Ray Stantz tinkering with the proton pack though, with Harold gone, he's the only one. Peter Venkman never showed any sort of technical aptitude before, neither did Winston. I can't imagine a proton pack and neutrino thrower is the sort of thing that anyone could pick up and put together. Ray would be the only one other than Egon that could do it. He might've had a kid and taught her everything she knows. Or pull an extreme Ghostbusters kind of deal I never watched Extreme Ghostbusters, it always looked kind of silly from what little I saw of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 27, 2019 Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 https://twitter.com/Ghostbusters/status/1144274190910066688?s=19 YESSSSS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted June 27, 2019 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2019 I can always go for some Rudd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Dreadful Posted July 3, 2019 Report Share Posted July 3, 2019 I can always go for some Rudd. have you seen his 2011 movie called "My Idiot Brother" ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted December 9, 2019 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2019 New trailer and official title: As expected, I'm hearing a lot of bitching and negativity from people. But, I'm honestly intrigued by the new trailer. I like the concept of Spengler's grandkids being the main characters...and I'm expecting a Spengler ghost, and cameos of the original living Ghostbusters as well...should be a nice tribute to Harold Ramis if done right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam the d00d Posted December 9, 2019 Report Share Posted December 9, 2019 I mean it doesnt look bad and Im seeing a lot of positive reactions from fans, but it feels like theres a large number who got something totally different from Ghostbusters than I did. To me, it was just some sort of silly comedy like Caddy Shack or Groundhog Day. I guess its a lot more sacred to some people cause the trailer plays on this dewy-eyed nostalgia similar to a Force Awakens. Where like props from the movie are held as these sacred symbols. It definitely appears to be calculated. Its damage control cause the last one was a piece of shit. Its doing what Force Awakens had to do in response to the prequels. Its just sort of more fitting for Star Wars cause thats like a multi-generational familial saga at its core and Ghostbusters is a movie where Dan Akyroyd gets his dick sucked by a ghost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted December 9, 2019 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2019 Of course Ghostbusters is a big franchise, and much more than a "generational comedy". There have been tons of different cartoons and comic books, toy lines, video games. Yeah...it's a big thing. Not sure what rock you've been living under since the 80's... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graeme Jones Posted December 9, 2019 Report Share Posted December 9, 2019 The first Ghostbusters film is my favourite, but I enjoyed the 2nd as well. As for the all fe....hell nah, forget that nightmare! Anyway, this looks ... interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam the d00d Posted December 9, 2019 Report Share Posted December 9, 2019 I not saying its not a big franchise. Im just saying like Id think its strange if they did like a reboot of Caddy Shack or something and the trailer had no jokes with dramatic music cues set to Rodney Dangerfields stereo golf bag and gophers. Because I always personally read Ghostbusters as more of a comedy than anything else. It wasnt like Star Wars or something where there were toys, cartoons, and comic books sustaining 20 years after the movie was released, those were all in the moment. It was just a movie youd catch of Comedy Central on Saturdays between Mad TV reruns. People ten years older than me likely have a completely different reading on it. Thats all Im getting at. Not that Im seeing it for what it truly is or anything, just that without all those other tie-ins being present one wouldnt likely think the next step after Ghostbusters 2 would be something that seems to be aiming at something Spielbergian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango kid Posted December 9, 2019 Report Share Posted December 9, 2019 Of course Ghostbusters is a big franchise, and much more than a "generational comedy". There have been tons of different cartoons and comic books, toy lines, video games. Yeah...it's a big thing. Not sure what rock you've been living under since the 80's... It was big in there 80s early 90s but now I wouldn't say it big But Ghostbusters is featured on movies that made us a spin-off series of the toys that made us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Dreadful Posted December 10, 2019 Report Share Posted December 10, 2019 Of course Ghostbusters is a big franchise, and much more than a "generational comedy". There have been tons of different cartoons and comic books, toy lines, video games. Yeah...it's a big thing. Not sure what rock you've been living under since the 80's... It was big in there 80s early 90s but now I wouldn't say it big But Ghostbusters is featured on movies that made us a spin-off series of the toys that made us yes, it is. GB has always popular. its just that it was never saturated with 'too much of it' like Star Wars is now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeM Posted December 12, 2019 Report Share Posted December 12, 2019 On one hand it looks really good from the trailer and all the right people are making the right noises about it. However I still have the horrible nagging feeling that this could turn out like Thunderbirds did all those years ago - just being a Spy Kids type disappointment. Still I am excited for April. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunchbox Posted December 13, 2019 Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 If the Ecto-1 wasn't in that commercial you would have zero idea that wasn't a Ghostbusters movie. It just felt generic. No New York too much of a serious tone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted December 13, 2019 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 No New York too much of a serious tone. Ah yes...because Ghostbusters HAS to be about New York. I stand by my previous assessment. This is a good trailer. Most trailers spoil the entire movie, and it sucks. I really do think this trailer shows the bare minimum, while keeping the best surprises for people who actually see the film. I can feel that shit in my bones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeM Posted December 13, 2019 Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 Main question for me is that is clearly Ecto 1. So was Ecto 1 stored somewhere during GB2 and the video game, and Ecto 1a / 1b an entirely different vehicle? Or are they effectively retconning GB2 and the videogame - which is a shame as they were supposed to be canon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.