JGPLX. Posted January 6, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 Well this is in the WWE section not the general wrestling Cos Ronda Rousey isn't in Dragon Gate you nonce OK yes I mentioned Sheamus' first WWE year as his rookie year although technically he wrestled before this, but if people are gonna honestly say that his time in IWW is the same of AJ's decade and a half in TNA/NJPW are comparable, then that's pretty dumb. Also gonna throw a spanner in the works, this is David Arquette's rookie year, not 1999. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunchbox Posted January 6, 2019 Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 so i am to believe that Sting was a rookie when i finally came to WWE a few years ago. yeah. ok. sure. Yes, in the WWE it was his rookie year, is it really that hard to understand. Also alot of you are treating the word rookie as if is a bad thing, its not at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creepia Posted January 6, 2019 Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 so i am to believe that Sting was a rookie when i finally came to WWE a few years ago. yeah. ok. sure. Yes, in the WWE it was his rookie year, is it really that hard to understand. Also alot of you are treating the word rookie as if is a bad thing, its not at all. No one is finding it hard to understand. It's just dumb to use that technicality, because neither Sting nor AJ were rookies when they came to WWE. It being their 'rookie year' is a misnomer, it's just their debut year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunchbox Posted January 6, 2019 Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 so i am to believe that Sting was a rookie when i finally came to WWE a few years ago. yeah. ok. sure. Yes, in the WWE it was his rookie year, is it really that hard to understand. Also alot of you are treating the word rookie as if is a bad thing, its not at all. No one is finding it hard to understand. It's just dumb to use that technicality, because neither Sting nor AJ were rookies when they came to WWE. It being their 'rookie year' is a misnomer, it's just their debut year. If you want to use that same logic they debuted as wrestlers years ago which, like you said, makes that dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEGION Posted January 6, 2019 Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 so i am to believe that Sting was a rookie when i finally came to WWE a few years ago. yeah. ok. sure. Yes, in the WWE it was his rookie year, is it really that hard to understand. Also alot of you are treating the word rookie as if is a bad thing, its not at all. No one is finding it hard to understand. It's just dumb to use that technicality, because neither Sting nor AJ were rookies when they came to WWE. It being their 'rookie year' is a misnomer, it's just their debut year. If you want to use that same logic they debuted as wrestlers years ago which, like you said, makes that dumb. Not really. Debuting for a promotion =/= being a rookie to the Sport Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunchbox Posted January 6, 2019 Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 so i am to believe that Sting was a rookie when i finally came to WWE a few years ago. yeah. ok. sure.Yes, in the WWE it was his rookie year, is it really that hard to understand. Also alot of you are treating the word rookie as if is a bad thing, its not at all. No one is finding it hard to understand. It's just dumb to use that technicality, because neither Sting nor AJ were rookies when they came to WWE. It being their 'rookie year' is a misnomer, it's just their debut year. If you want to use that same logic they debuted as wrestlers years ago which, like you said, makes that dumb. Not really.Debuting for a promotion =/= being a rookie to the Sport But noones saying its his rookie year for the sport as a whole, people are saying his first year in the WWE was his rookie year in WWE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creepia Posted January 6, 2019 Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 so i am to believe that Sting was a rookie when i finally came to WWE a few years ago. yeah. ok. sure.Yes, in the WWE it was his rookie year, is it really that hard to understand. Also alot of you are treating the word rookie as if is a bad thing, its not at all. No one is finding it hard to understand. It's just dumb to use that technicality, because neither Sting nor AJ were rookies when they came to WWE. It being their 'rookie year' is a misnomer, it's just their debut year. If you want to use that same logic they debuted as wrestlers years ago which, like you said, makes that dumb. Not really.Debuting for a promotion =/= being a rookie to the Sport But noones saying its his rookie year for the sport as a whole, people are saying his first year in the WWE was his rookie year in WWE. Who is he? We're talking about Ronda. It's her legitimate rookie year. Ya'll wanna keep ragging over technicalities and misnomers for some reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEGION Posted January 6, 2019 Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 There are no "Rookie" years to certain promotions. You're either new to the sport or you aren't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunchbox Posted January 6, 2019 Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 Its crazy cause if you google AJ Styles Rookie year its talk about his rookie year in WWE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creepia Posted January 6, 2019 Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 Man it's crazy that sometimes speech is used wrong and that things become misnomers and colloquialism's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunchbox Posted January 6, 2019 Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 Listen WWE is referring to it as his rookie year as awell as a ton of different articles. Noone had any problems when D-Bry and a ton of other dudes with experience were being labeled as rookies during the first few seasons of NXT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creepia Posted January 6, 2019 Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 I'm sure many people took issue with Bryan being labelled a rookie. In fact, they gave him Miz as his 'pro' just to rile people up over that very fact. You go back to this site when that happened, I'm sure people were bitching then. I'd put money on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEGION Posted January 6, 2019 Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 Yeah. The whole IWC was all up about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willows Way Posted January 6, 2019 Report Share Posted January 6, 2019 Low-Ki too when he was paired with Laycool lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JGPLX. Posted January 7, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2019 Listen WWE is referring to it as his rookie year as awell as a ton of different articles. Noone had any problems when D-Bry and a ton of other dudes with experience were being labeled as rookies during the first few seasons of NXT. This is the first time Bryan has been brought up in this topic so yeah I'm pretty sure no one considers him a rookie. If I'd made the topic of this title 'Is Ronda Rousey's first year in WWE the best of all time?', then yeah AJ is in the discussion. But I didn't, I didn't even specify 'rookie WWE year'. If people wanna argue that guys like Sheamus weren't technically rookies, then cool, at least that's a more convincing argument than 'AJ is a rookie cos Google told me'. Like another member said, first year in WWE does not equal rookie year. WWE may refer to this as AJ's rookie year but I'm not and I made this topic so yeah listen to my dumb ass instead of WWE's revisionist history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.