Jump to content

Official WrestleMania 34 Discussion Thread


Jmerc

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Takers got his straps down breathing heavy, Black lifts up Takers head with his foot, throat slashes Black. Black throat slashes back & then BOOM! Black Mass, career over.

 

Post match has Taker doing his kneel pose with Black doing his sit down pose. Lights go on and off with the urn in front of Black.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like Austin's posts a few pages back are justified (about Taker destroying his legacy and turning out like 'The Wrestler'). I feel it's hypocritical of people to criticise Austin for saying this but then also posting stuff like '*Censored* Taker' at the same time (only to those applicable of course). Taker is my all-time favourite wrestler but I think an argument can be made that if he keeps wrestling, he could seriously damage his legacy, and/or worse, his health. I really hope neither happens.

 

Also I feel like Austin isn't a troll at all, he's just a guy who's got some outlandish opinions (and does post some awful shit at time tbf) and he got this rep as a troll cos of that and his spelling/grammar. But if he was really a troll he would have been banned ages ago I reckon. I see what you're doing Austin, you do you.

Austin is a troll, his display name actually confirms that. The main issue is that people react to him though, rather than ignoring him.

 

 

 

I feel like Austin's posts a few pages back are justified (about Taker destroying his legacy and turning out like 'The Wrestler'). I feel it's hypocritical of people to criticise Austin for saying this but then also posting stuff like '*Censored* Taker' at the same time (only to those applicable of course). Taker is my all-time favourite wrestler but I think an argument can be made that if he keeps wrestling, he could seriously damage his legacy, and/or worse, his health. I really hope neither happens.

 

Also I feel like Austin isn't a troll at all, he's just a guy who's got some outlandish opinions (and does post some awful shit at time tbf) and he got this rep as a troll cos of that and his spelling/grammar. But if he was really a troll he would have been banned ages ago I reckon. I see what you're doing Austin, you do you.

 

Which is no one, so I have no idea who you're talking to exactly.

 

There's been plenty of posts like the latter on here recently saying Taker should retire, etc (which I guess is a fair point but a disrespectful way to put it), then there are members who jump on Austin for saying that Taker is destroying his legacy. If the same member is doing both then that's pretty hypocritical. It's not directed at anyone in particular cos I can't say for sure what every member is posting in regards to Taker.

 

Saying Taker should retire isn't disrespectful though, unless you mean they say that in a disrespectful way. I love Taker, but even I think he should retire if he can't hang or gets hurt too often.

 

 

If anyone lives in or near NYC or wants to go to NYC, we can meet up at a bar that allows Wrestlemania viewing! https://www.reddit.com/r/SquaredCircle/comments/82opro/know_of_a_bar_thats_going_to_be_playing/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taker's legacy can never be damaged. It is what it is...

 

Furthermore, seeing Taker break down over the past few years is perfect. It's an awesome story if you stop worrying about the past and just enjoy it. Even the timing of Taker's decline makes sense in the context of Paul Bearer passing away. His match with Punk was the last time that he looked remotely close to full health. He's been slumping ever since. And if he returns as the American Badass, that would make sense too; It would be kind of like a Super Sayain reverting back to a normal form. Like...he was ABA by choice in the past, but now he's fully lost the power of the Undertaker...he's just a dude again.

 

A lot of pro wrestling is suspending your disbelief and wanting to actually enjoy what you're watching. Even as a strong believer that Taker should have retired years ago, I can still see a cohesive story being told in his performance.

I feel like that's more filling in the blanks with your own narrative rather than it being written within WWE's kayfabe (I wish WWE has writing that deep and sophisticated but alas we don't), but that's totally cool.

 

Also to clarify, I'm not saying that Taker is damaging his legacy, I was just pointing out that Austin suggesting it wasn't an outlandish or troll-esque opinion (but that's been cleared up anyway).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not gonna lie, I *censored*ing love that there are like 5 matches that stand a chance at main eventing. (Shane/Bryan Vs Zayn/Owens, Ronda/Kurt Vs The Authority, Styles Vs Nakamura, Reigns Vs Lesnar, Cena Vs Taker.) Obiviously some stand more of a chance than others, but I cant remember the last time we even had three matches on that level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bray to return at WM as Husky Harris and be Braun's surprise tag team partner. What a story that'll be, though, if Wyatt/Strowman and Harper and Rowan leave the show with the RAW and SD Tag Team titles. :lol:

 

That would be kinda awesome for me tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...