Jump to content

CAWs.ws
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Feed

Why Roman Reigns might be pushed so much... [Theory]

roman reigns wwe raw theory rumours wrestling

  • Please log in to reply
107 replies to this topic

#81 Papa Paul

Papa Paul

    Midcard

  • Banned
  • 1,414 posts

Posted 12 April 2017 - 11:54 PM

 

Wasn't it you who couldn't answer my question of something like "Why would the crowd be silent for Roman when they enjoy him being there?". If so, then the irony is quite nice.

 

I don't recall that but if I didn't answer that it's because it's a question that's started with false premises. It's the same as me asking 'Why would 3+3 be equal to 6 when 3+3 is equal to 2?'.

 

My answer would be because 3+3=6 is a mathematical fact, whereas 3+3=2 is a contradiction to this fact. What false premises do you mean? That the crowd enjoys him being there?
 



#82 Beardd

Beardd

    Hall of Famer

  • V.I.P
  • 19,719 posts

Posted 13 April 2017 - 01:18 AM

I don't think the crowd would miss him.

I'll be honest. My friends and I cheered for him just to annoy people around us BUT I legit wouldn't have cared whether he was there or not (when they came to Toronto).

He's no John Cena.

Edited by Respect The Beard, 13 April 2017 - 01:35 AM.


#83 Willows Way

Willows Way

    Official CAWs.ws Addict

  • Members
  • 39,459 posts

Posted 13 April 2017 - 01:31 AM

Majority of fans would not miss Roman one bit lol

#84 Muur

Muur

    Junosona

  • Members
  • 33,157 posts
  • Location: Bolton, England
  • Gamertag: Marcus BWFC
  • SEN (PS3): Muur1993
  • Steam ID: MarcusBWFC
  • Twitter: @MarcusRalphson

Posted 13 April 2017 - 03:18 AM

 

Nice question dodging. And if you think Vince saw Daniel Bryan as the guy in 2012 you're delusional.

Why wouldn't he have seen him as the guy?

Oh, sorry I forgot to mention that Vince is this evil businessman who conspires against those who aren't "big". Better now?

 

 

I mean, before everyone shit on the main event of Randy vs Batista, Bryan was set to face Sheamus for a third Mania in a row in the mid card. Bryan was only added at the last second so that someone in the main event would be cheered. After that, Bryan dropped back down to the midcard with the IC title



#85 Creepia

Creepia

    WARDANCE.

  • Members
  • 42,563 posts
  • Location: Portsmouth, England.
  • SEN (PS3): CreepingHD
  • Twitter: CochiseJak

Posted 13 April 2017 - 07:15 AM

Anyone who main events Mania 3 years in a row is gonna get 'a buzz' and topics like this, I don't get that point...

 

 

5: Vince likes him, because he has the "big man" type look that he feels a WWE superstar "hero" should be.


Holy shit can we stop saying that "Vince lieks big guys" in 2017.

 

Lol, is it not true? Oh nevermind, it isn't because Daniel Bryan and CM Punk were WWE champs. Please.

 

Who cares, it's just *censored*ing lame to hear in 2017. Find something new to say.

 

I'm not saying it's because either of those were champions. Don't assume things. 


Edited by Creep., 13 April 2017 - 07:17 AM.


#86 Beardd

Beardd

    Hall of Famer

  • V.I.P
  • 19,719 posts

Posted 13 April 2017 - 07:35 AM

He likes charismatic guys who can work a mic. With a few obvious exceptions like Reigns and Balor.

#87 M3J

M3J

    Captain Fap

  • Members
  • 53,730 posts
  • SEN (PS3): ask in PM
  • Twitter: ask in PM

Posted 13 April 2017 - 07:49 AM

I know it's cliche to say it, but the only reason Roman Reigns is being pushed so hard is because of threads like this.  He's the new "most controversial WWE Superstar™"!  It's funny to think that if we had as much discussion about Alex Riley, he would be the face of the company right now instead.  Maybe even Bo Dallas.  All they had to do was create some buzz, but they couldn't do it.  Roman Reigns is the perfect guy for the job in WWE.  Anywhere else, he'd be abysmal.  But in WWE, being able to generate buzz and speculation is all you need.      


I enjoy watching Roman Reigns fail.  I looked forward to seeing him drop the ball at WrestleMania.  I was a little concerned that me may not deliver.  Maybe he had improved since I last watched him.  Nope.  He delivered and I'm sorry I ever doubted him!  

 

If you like the WWE style, he brings something to the table for everybody.  Maybe you're like me and want to see a car crash.  Maybe you genuinely just like the character (nothing wrong with that!).  Or maybe you're one of the many people who gets just as much enjoyment out of complaining about wrestling on the internet as you do actually watching.  Whatever the case, the Big Dog has you covered.  

Didn't Ryder create tons of buzz but got shat on by WWE? What about Punk losing steam or looking bad or something? Went from being a champion who rarely headlined to being in a feud with a second-rate stable or something. 



#88 Monkey D. Jiggy

Monkey D. Jiggy

    Kurosaki Ichigo

  • Members
  • 24,633 posts
  • Location: Vegapunk's Lab
  • Twitter: @Jackel_Ramzilla

Posted 13 April 2017 - 09:43 AM

I know it's cliche to say it, but the only reason Roman Reigns is being pushed so hard is because of threads like this.  He's the new "most controversial WWE Superstar™"!  It's funny to think that if we had as much discussion about Alex Riley, he would be the face of the company right now instead.  Maybe even Bo Dallas.  All they had to do was create some buzz, but they couldn't do it.  Roman Reigns is the perfect guy for the job in WWE.  Anywhere else, he'd be abysmal.  But in WWE, being able to generate buzz and speculation is all you need.      


I enjoy watching Roman Reigns fail.  I looked forward to seeing him drop the ball at WrestleMania.  I was a little concerned that me may not deliver.  Maybe he had improved since I last watched him.  Nope.  He delivered and I'm sorry I ever doubted him!  

 

If you like the WWE style, he brings something to the table for everybody.  Maybe you're like me and want to see a car crash.  Maybe you genuinely just like the character (nothing wrong with that!).  Or maybe you're one of the many people who gets just as much enjoyment out of complaining about wrestling on the internet as you do actually watching.  Whatever the case, the Big Dog has you covered.  

 

I absolutely love the way you look at wrestling in the WWE and what you're looking to get out of it btw.
 



#89 Creepia

Creepia

    WARDANCE.

  • Members
  • 42,563 posts
  • Location: Portsmouth, England.
  • SEN (PS3): CreepingHD
  • Twitter: CochiseJak

Posted 13 April 2017 - 10:21 AM

Except he doesn't bring something to the table for everybody, because many people just don't want to watch him lmao. 



#90 PopUpPowerPost

PopUpPowerPost

    Midcard

  • Members
  • 1,918 posts
  • Location: London,UK

Posted 13 April 2017 - 11:43 AM

If I was you, I'd make a doctors appointment and when they ask what's wrong, show them this thread..

#91 Creepia

Creepia

    WARDANCE.

  • Members
  • 42,563 posts
  • Location: Portsmouth, England.
  • SEN (PS3): CreepingHD
  • Twitter: CochiseJak

Posted 13 April 2017 - 11:48 AM

The irony



#92 JGPLX.

JGPLX.

    RIP Daisy

  • Members
  • 16,966 posts

Posted 13 April 2017 - 12:10 PM

 

 

Wasn't it you who couldn't answer my question of something like "Why would the crowd be silent for Roman when they enjoy him being there?". If so, then the irony is quite nice.

 

I don't recall that but if I didn't answer that it's because it's a question that's started with false premises. It's the same as me asking 'Why would 3+3 be equal to 6 when 3+3 is equal to 2?'.

 

My answer would be because 3+3=6 is a mathematical fact, whereas 3+3=2 is a contradiction to this fact. What false premises do you mean? That the crowd enjoys him being there?
 

 

Omg it's you...



#93 Papa Paul

Papa Paul

    Midcard

  • Banned
  • 1,414 posts

Posted 13 April 2017 - 12:33 PM

Don't make me blush.



#94 MikeM

MikeM

    Big Daddy

  • Members
  • 7,692 posts
  • Location: South England
  • Gamertag: DaShowstoppa24
  • SEN (PS3): (PSN) BigDaddyMM24

Posted 13 April 2017 - 12:41 PM

 

I know it's cliche to say it, but the only reason Roman Reigns is being pushed so hard is because of threads like this.  He's the new "most controversial WWE Superstar™"!  It's funny to think that if we had as much discussion about Alex Riley, he would be the face of the company right now instead.  Maybe even Bo Dallas.  All they had to do was create some buzz, but they couldn't do it.  Roman Reigns is the perfect guy for the job in WWE.  Anywhere else, he'd be abysmal.  But in WWE, being able to generate buzz and speculation is all you need.      


I enjoy watching Roman Reigns fail.  I looked forward to seeing him drop the ball at WrestleMania.  I was a little concerned that me may not deliver.  Maybe he had improved since I last watched him.  Nope.  He delivered and I'm sorry I ever doubted him!  

 

If you like the WWE style, he brings something to the table for everybody.  Maybe you're like me and want to see a car crash.  Maybe you genuinely just like the character (nothing wrong with that!).  Or maybe you're one of the many people who gets just as much enjoyment out of complaining about wrestling on the internet as you do actually watching.  Whatever the case, the Big Dog has you covered.  

Didn't Ryder create tons of buzz but got shat on by WWE? What about Punk losing steam or looking bad or something? Went from being a champion who rarely headlined to being in a feud with a second-rate stable or something. 

 

 

Ryder got shot down because he dared to get over on his own, and that wasn't the plan. So WWE did what they often do, take something hot and attach "their guy" to it (same with the New Day, they put Cena in there with them) Roman is very much the plan, and if the desired reaction isn't forthcoming then they'll take any sort of reaction they can.

 

I wouldn't be at all surprised to see them put the Hardys with him on Raw soon in a match / angle because they'd like some of the rub from them being epically over to transmit to Roman.



#95 PopUpPowerPost

PopUpPowerPost

    Midcard

  • Members
  • 1,918 posts
  • Location: London,UK

Posted 13 April 2017 - 01:42 PM

The irony

a joke. Not to mention, coming from a creep*, who has a hate list on a social networking forum site.

I know you love me really 😘

#96 Creepia

Creepia

    WARDANCE.

  • Members
  • 42,563 posts
  • Location: Portsmouth, England.
  • SEN (PS3): CreepingHD
  • Twitter: CochiseJak

Posted 13 April 2017 - 01:47 PM

"A hate list."

 

If yours was a joke maybe you should have recognised mine too lmao. 



#97 PopUpPowerPost

PopUpPowerPost

    Midcard

  • Members
  • 1,918 posts
  • Location: London,UK

Posted 13 April 2017 - 01:57 PM

"A hate list."
 
If yours was a joke maybe you should have recognised mine too lmao. 

say it in a stepbrothers voice. You obviously didn't see mine was a joke, unless you have a hate list.

*Censored* you, Brendan.

#98 Creepia

Creepia

    WARDANCE.

  • Members
  • 42,563 posts
  • Location: Portsmouth, England.
  • SEN (PS3): CreepingHD
  • Twitter: CochiseJak

Posted 13 April 2017 - 02:10 PM

What the hell are you even on about.

#99 JGPLX.

JGPLX.

    RIP Daisy

  • Members
  • 16,966 posts

Posted 13 April 2017 - 02:38 PM

:lol:



#100 LEGION

LEGION

    15,295,600,000

  • Members
  • 40,900 posts
  • Steam ID: Ectrasyl
  • Twitter: @SennaAsad

Posted 13 April 2017 - 05:15 PM

Lmao





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: roman, reigns, wwe, raw, theory, rumours, wrestling