CROSS-Out Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Someone said they have to ask for permission from the tattoo artist, as they were slightly different than on the DDP base model, logically its counted as a complete different model regardless our association to it because of same name, and couldn't re get permission? Which I think doesn't make sense really. Or just a developer oversight. Its because they changed how they do tattoos. They have to get permission from the original artist (IE the tattoo artist) for each tattoo, and likely have to get permission for putting the tattoo on each model. It's entirely possible that they have to pay royalties if the artist so desires as well, perhaps even royalties per model. It's also possible they couldn't find the original artist in time or simply could not come to a deal. It sucks, but its also what allowed us to get stuff like Jerichos tattoos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niffan Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Jericho's tattoos in 2K17 are knockoffs of his real tattoos though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango kid Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 wish we could get rid of the nightstick for the champiship entrence and it be perfect for corbin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarGreymon77 Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 You used to be able to get rid of entrance props. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acerbus Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 In Universe does anyone have a problem getting championship rivalries to register for DLC characters? I have reset my universe twice and it still won't work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real J.J. Jones Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 It's a Damn shame there's no glitch this year to allow logos on in game superstars skin. Would've been an easy fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulie Walnuts Posted March 7, 2017 Report Share Posted March 7, 2017 Someone said they have to ask for permission from the tattoo artist, as they were slightly different than on the DDP base model, logically its counted as a complete different model regardless our association to it because of same name, and couldn't re get permission? Which I think doesn't make sense really. Or just a developer oversight. Its because they changed how they do tattoos. They have to get permission from the original artist (IE the tattoo artist) for each tattoo, and likely have to get permission for putting the tattoo on each model. It's entirely possible that they have to pay royalties if the artist so desires as well, perhaps even royalties per model. It's also possible they couldn't find the original artist in time or simply could not come to a deal. It sucks, but its also what allowed us to get stuff like Jerichos tattoos. I wouldn't be surprised, honestly. As EA & Madden use the same formula, which is why so few player models have there real tattoos, or tattoos period really. And I remember guys asking the developer why OBJ & Kapernick were the only ones with their tattoos and one of the developers responded on twitter saying they could only get permission from the tattoo artists of the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNetworkZ Posted March 9, 2017 Report Share Posted March 9, 2017 I'm late on this, but I'm so happy Smackdown came with its proper show theme in the DLC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango kid Posted March 9, 2017 Report Share Posted March 9, 2017 Yeah aren't tattoos protect by copyright or trademark cuz there consider art work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eastcoastkody Posted March 10, 2017 Report Share Posted March 10, 2017 Yeah aren't tattoos protect by copyright or trademark cuz there consider art work thats so dumb. Tattoo artists make a living infringing on copyrights. If i get Bart Simpson saying eat my shorts tatted on my ass....are they going to pay FOX? i feel like this all happened because of the Hangover movie...and using mike tysons Face tat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ya Boy Punk Fan Posted March 10, 2017 Report Share Posted March 10, 2017 Yeah aren't tattoos protect by copyright or trademark cuz there consider art work thats so dumb. Tattoo artists make a living infringing on copyrights. If i get Bart Simpson saying eat my shorts tatted on my ass....are they going to pay FOX? Agreed 100%. (Lebron James' tattoo artist started it btw) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthedoctor Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 Someone said they have to ask for permission from the tattoo artist, as they were slightly different than on the DDP base model, logically its counted as a complete different model regardless our association to it because of same name, and couldn't re get permission? Which I think doesn't make sense really. Or just a developer oversight. Its because they changed how they do tattoos. They have to get permission from the original artist (IE the tattoo artist) for each tattoo, and likely have to get permission for putting the tattoo on each model. It's entirely possible that they have to pay royalties if the artist so desires as well, perhaps even royalties per model. It's also possible they couldn't find the original artist in time or simply could not come to a deal. It sucks, but its also what allowed us to get stuff like Jerichos tattoos. Seems a bit of a lame excuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CROSS-Out Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 Someone said they have to ask for permission from the tattoo artist, as they were slightly different than on the DDP base model, logically its counted as a complete different model regardless our association to it because of same name, and couldn't re get permission? Which I think doesn't make sense really. Or just a developer oversight. Its because they changed how they do tattoos. They have to get permission from the original artist (IE the tattoo artist) for each tattoo, and likely have to get permission for putting the tattoo on each model. It's entirely possible that they have to pay royalties if the artist so desires as well, perhaps even royalties per model. It's also possible they couldn't find the original artist in time or simply could not come to a deal. It sucks, but its also what allowed us to get stuff like Jerichos tattoos. Seems a bit of a lame excuse. Doesn't matter what it seems like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmazingAries Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 It's a Damn shame there's no glitch this year to allow logos on in game superstars skin. Would've been an easy fix. Yep but we all know the individual who ruined that. For the tattoos if it's an issues far as trademark its bc the tattoo artist is a world reknown brand meaning it's different from when we get tatts at a local shop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.