SameerExtinct Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Taker vs Kane - Wrestlemania 14 is one of my few favorite matches and in my opinion that is the only Wrestlemania match where Taker's opponent was very strong and dominating overall in the match which is Kane.If the streak had to be ended before,i have no problem in seeing Kane ending it.The old Masked Kane.Sure he is perfect for it.But even though i always thought that the Undertaker's streak don't need to end.He should have retired without the Streak ending.AnywayI was disappointed after seeing his Wrestlemania 30 match with Brock.I won't watch Wrestlemania here after. It is the only PPV i remember to watch and that is because if an Undertaker match involve in it.I don't know how to explain it that after seeing the streak is over,i just feel like i no longer have the need to watch wrestling even though rarely i watch WWE.I feel like some kind of bomb fell on the interest i had in watching wrestling sometimes.Anyway..I first started watching wrestling from 98,Taker was in his prime.He became my first favorite wrestler.He was big and so athletic for his size.Imagine 99 Ministry Taker vs Brock..Wow.The Ministry Taker would be somewhat bigger than Brock.The different bad ass attires he wears with those amazing Entrance.I will not forget those. LONG LIVE THE LEGENDARY PHENOM. I LOVE YOU UNDERTAKER...How many of you think that the Undertaker should have retired without the Streak ending ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E#37 Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Holy spoiler Batman! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generations Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Topic title is a huge spoiler for people who haven't seen WM yet. Probably the biggest spoiler in wrestling history. Of course, let's be real...everyone must know by now anyway... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Vercetti Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Ipse come do your job pls Anyway I didn't want it to end but if Taker wanted it to then so be it,dude's done it all in this business. All that's left is a HOF induction which he's defo earned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyriqz ✪ Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Huge spoiler, change the title. No, but I think the one to break it was wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montana Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 If he was going to end it it should of been a way better match with better build up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poe Øhlin Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 If he was going to end it it should of been a way better match with better build up. Pretty much sums it up to a good old capital T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E#37 Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 It was the right choice. Wrestlemania 30 needed a moment for the ages and this is exactly that. This is our Hogan slamming Andre moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEGION Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 If he was going to end it it should of been a way better match with better build up. pretty much this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cenasucksass Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 i wanted it to end just not with brock i like the guy but didnt think he desereverd this honor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiceManeuver Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 i wanted to end but the wrong guy did the job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The D Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Posted this elsewhere earlier: The undertaker was awful in that match, truly awful. The dude is in a lot of pain, very noticibly smaller in size and hasn't aged well. He didn't go for any of his signature WrestleMania type moves including the dive and didn't even hit Old School. He barely bumped and looked winded from the first suplex Lesnar threw. Lesnar carried The Undertaker last night at WrestleMania, which is hard for me to say. Lesnar is a victim of being the right person, in the right place, at the right time. Brock Lesnar is a mainstream, legitimised sports celebrity with an incredible athletic history in WWE, UFC and amateur wrestling. No man on the planet has amassed the same list of credentials as Brock Lesnar. The arguement of putting over a younger guy is a legit one, but who are they going to put over? The only one left to face Undertaker is Cena, and Undertaker simply can't go another year. Maybe Reigns could have broken it, but imagine a young dude breaking the streak and then leaving the business? At least Lesnar is a legit tough guy, a real international multi-sport star and most importantly BELIEVABLE. I would have loved to have seen Undertaker's last match be a real classic, with a new young star who would go on to have an amazing career based off of that win, but the reality is that that is a dream scenario. That isn't the situation WWE and 'Taker are in. He almost didn't make the match at WM29 due to his health. This is simply the best of a bad situation, and a situation that shows that Undertaker should have retired a couple of years ago. Either Shawn Michaels should have ended the streak and retired at WM26, or Triple H should have ended it at WM28. The best part of the whole thing is that NO-ONE SAW IT COMING. If a young guy had stepped up and gone against him then you might have seen it coming. That was the most stunned I've ever seen a wrestling crowd and it was PERFECT. The anger, confusion and sadness on everyone's face was PRICELESS. Taker said it leading up to the match, he said that the streak would end, JBL said it over and over, Cole said that all streaks must end eventually. For a few years now the tone has changed from not IF Undertaker would get beaten, but WHEN. Go back and watch Triple H vs Undertaker and it's the same thing; hints everywhere, that statement made loads of times. WWE has been laying the groundwork for the streak to end. I don't believe that WWE had always planned for Brock to beat Taker and for Taker to retire after WMXXX, but that's the hand that they were delt and considering the hand they got, I think they played it the best that they possibly could. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brahma Bull Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Yep, "believable" is the key word. The only new guys on the roster that could have ended it were Wyatt or Reigns. But to have the streak end by a legitimate fighter is also a good thing. My initial reaction was pure shock, but in the end the "right" man did it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drive slow Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 ^ Great post. It was truly heartbreaking, but it just felt like it had to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montana Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Lesnar didn't carry Taker considering Lesnar as well was tired and botched a pretty decent amount of moves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muur Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 I didn't want it to end, was probably the right thing to do but ugh. Nah scratch that, option 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crack. Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 The ending of the Streak was the right choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The D Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Lesnar didn't carry Taker considering Lesnar as well was tired and botched a pretty decent amount of moves. I don't recall seeing Brock botch at all. Lesnar wasn't blown up to the point where everything he did looked weak either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEGION Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Lesnar didn't carry Taker considering Lesnar as well was tired and botched a pretty decent amount of moves. I don't recall seeing Brock botch at all. Lesnar wasn't blown up to the point where everything he did looked weak either. He was still drowning in his own sweat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brahma Bull Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Brock always sweats. Men sweat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montana Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Lesnar didn't carry Taker considering Lesnar as well was tired and botched a pretty decent amount of moves.I don't recall seeing Brock botch at all. Lesnar wasn't blown up to the point where everything he did looked weak either. He botched the reversal to the Hell's gate the first time. Botched the tombstone the first time because he didnt hang his body low enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarGreymon77 Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 I hate Lesnar, but it might've been a good thing. This way, Taker and Sting can have a match at Wrestlemania without it being obvious who's going to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brahma Bull Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 I hate Lesnar, but it might've been a good thing. This way, Taker and Sting can have a match at Wrestlemania without it being obvious who's going to win. Very true, however I think the appeal for that match has faded anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The D Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 Lesnar didn't carry Taker considering Lesnar as well was tired and botched a pretty decent amount of moves.I don't recall seeing Brock botch at all. Lesnar wasn't blown up to the point where everything he did looked weak either. He botched the reversal to the Hell's gate the first time. Botched the tombstone the first time because he didnt hang his body low enough. Because he couldn't lift him up all the way to a powerbomb? That's REALISTIC. Also the tombstone isn't Brock's issue; he's upsidedown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEGION Posted April 7, 2014 Report Share Posted April 7, 2014 I hate Lesnar, but it might've been a good thing. This way, Taker and Sting can have a match at Wrestlemania without it being obvious who's going to win. I have no interested in a non streak Sting/Undertaker match/feud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.