Jump to content

CAWs.ws
Facebook Twitter YouTube RSS Feed

Unpopular Movie Opinions


  • Please log in to reply
3033 replies to this topic

#41 M3J

M3J

    Captain Fap

  • Members
  • 53,558 posts
  • SEN (PS3): ask in PM
  • Twitter: ask in PM

Posted 22 January 2013 - 08:33 AM

Agreed, my third favourite movie of all time(behind Scarface and The Godfather Part 1). I wouldn't say it's underrated 'cos people who have seen it say it's amazing, but more people need to watch it!

Agree there, it's a great film.

 

Rocky Balboa series is overrated, not that good.

 

Godfather III would be a good film or a great film as a standalone. It being the threquel to Godfather hurt it more than it helped, in my opinion.



#42 Chips.

Chips.

    #1 Rockstar on the Planet

  • Members
  • 11,393 posts
  • Location: England

Posted 22 January 2013 - 10:47 AM

 


I can't stand Star Wars, Star Trek, or Muppets. I, personally think they're horrible.

The pokemon movies/shows, albeit now as good as before, are still good

 
Have you seen the 2009 Star Trek?

I haven't seen it due to not liking the older ones

 

Should really give it a chance, I don't like the oldd ones either but Star Trek 2009 is one of the greatest.

 

Another one I believe is that Skyfall is one of the worst Bond films. As a massive Bond fan who owns pretty much every bit of merchandise from books to model cars to films to games etc. when people say Skyfall is the best Bond film to date, it's absolutely turns my stomach, I found it rather insulting as a Bond fan when Skyfall was first released that people were making this such bold statement, I personally believe it had nothing on films like Goldfinger, The Man With The Golden Gun or Goldeneye.

 

 

 

What did you not like about Skyfall? Also the only Bond movie close you named was Goldfinger.

 

Oh I totally forgot about Scarface... the most over-rated movie of all time by viewers imo, not critics. Yes Al Pacino was brilliant in it but the film overall isn't anywhere near the best.


Edited by Chips., 22 January 2013 - 10:50 AM.


#43 Kman

Kman

    Upper Midcard

  • Members
  • 2,764 posts
  • Location: North East, England
  • SEN (PS3): kmAn9tu

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:23 AM

Star Wars is overrated, so is Harry Potter.

 

Edward Norton was a better Bruce Banner/Hulk than Mark Ruffalo.

 

 


Edited by Kman, 22 January 2013 - 11:25 AM.


#44 RVF

RVF

    I just hate the general public.

  • Members
  • 14,928 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 01:01 PM

I don't think King's Speech should have won the Oscar for Best Picture.

I didn't think this was an unpopular view. I'd probably have at least 5 of the other nominated films above it.



#45 Twiztid Kratos

Twiztid Kratos

    Upper Midcard

  • Banned
  • 2,036 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 01:23 PM

Edward Norton was a better Bruce Banner/Hulk than Mark Ruffalo.

Not unpopular AT all, I agree and most if not all agree with this. 



#46 Kman

Kman

    Upper Midcard

  • Members
  • 2,764 posts
  • Location: North East, England
  • SEN (PS3): kmAn9tu

Posted 22 January 2013 - 01:57 PM

Edward Norton was a better Bruce Banner/Hulk than Mark Ruffalo.

Not unpopular AT all, I agree and most if not all agree with this. 

 

I was unaware of this, thats good.



#47 Twiztid Kratos

Twiztid Kratos

    Upper Midcard

  • Banned
  • 2,036 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 02:10 PM

 

Edward Norton was a better Bruce Banner/Hulk than Mark Ruffalo.

Not unpopular AT all, I agree and most if not all agree with this. 

 

I was unaware of this, thats good.

 

Wasn't trying to knock you at all my friend, I just 100% agree, but I also feel it is a tad bit unfair as Edward had a full film to show his talents as Banner, Ruffalo had minutes at best. 



#48 Mustacio

Mustacio

    That Handsome Devil

  • Members
  • 9,331 posts
  • Location: Denmark
  • Gamertag: DrMustacio

Posted 22 January 2013 - 05:13 PM

The Dark Knight is just "okay".



#49 sam the d00d

sam the d00d

    Legend

  • Members
  • 5,153 posts
  • Location: Missouri

Posted 22 January 2013 - 09:35 PM

I think no Harry Potter film has been absolutely outstanding. Fourth one was really the best. The fifth, sixth, and first seventh ones were very weak really. They've gotten so much critical acclaim and have done so well with audiences. They just don't hold up to me as well as they did when I was younger.

#50 Montana

Montana

    Legend

  • Members
  • 7,789 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:20 PM

Scarface is more than just cocaine dealer with the shoot Em up lifestyle.

#51 Avatar Mallen

Avatar Mallen

    Upper Midcard

  • Members
  • 2,029 posts
  • SEN (PS3): darth_mallen

Posted 23 January 2013 - 10:41 AM

Gone with the Wind and Nightmare Before Christmas were crap

#52 Craze Control

Craze Control

    Valar Morghulis

  • Members
  • 23,938 posts
  • Twitter: @Pogbessque

Posted 23 January 2013 - 11:25 AM

The Dark Knight Rises is much better than The Dark Knight. Ledger's portrayal of Joker is the major reason people rate it so high. Besides that, there wasn't really anything special about the movie.

#53 Voorhees_13

Voorhees_13

    Hella.

  • Members
  • 6,851 posts
  • Location: Arcadia Bay, Oregon

Posted 23 January 2013 - 11:40 AM

Anakin Skywalker's transition to Darth Vader in Episode Three is the best character in any movie ever.

You have just became my favorite member on this site

Also, Star Trek was never good

Edited by Cobain., 23 January 2013 - 11:45 AM.


#54 Kman

Kman

    Upper Midcard

  • Members
  • 2,764 posts
  • Location: North East, England
  • SEN (PS3): kmAn9tu

Posted 23 January 2013 - 12:32 PM

Tim Burton is terrible...



#55 TotallySam

TotallySam

    Main Eventer

  • Members
  • 3,148 posts

Posted 23 January 2013 - 07:22 PM


Tim Burton is terrible...


This. +1. X10. To the power of forever.

#56 sam the d00d

sam the d00d

    Legend

  • Members
  • 5,153 posts
  • Location: Missouri

Posted 23 January 2013 - 09:42 PM

The Dark Knight Rises is much better than The Dark Knight. Ledger's portrayal of Joker is the major reason people rate it so high. Besides that, there wasn't really anything special about the movie.


What was so much more special about Rises?

#57 Grenade.

Grenade.

    The Classic

  • Members
  • 13,189 posts
  • Gamertag: SomeRandyScrub
  • Steam ID: Liimbo

Posted 23 January 2013 - 09:44 PM

The Dark Knight Rises is much better than The Dark Knight. Ledger's portrayal of Joker is the major reason people rate it so high. Besides that, there wasn't really anything special about the movie.


So there wasn't anything special but the main villain who the story was centered around...

#58 Craze Control

Craze Control

    Valar Morghulis

  • Members
  • 23,938 posts
  • Twitter: @Pogbessque

Posted 23 January 2013 - 10:00 PM


The Dark Knight Rises is much better than The Dark Knight. Ledger's portrayal of Joker is the major reason people rate it so high. Besides that, there wasn't really anything special about the movie.


What was so much more special about Rises?

I personally enjoyed the story much more than I did for TDK. It had much more character depth and not essentially focused on just Batman and the villain (Bane). It had much more unpredictability and thrill value as well, in my opinion, like the Talia-al-Ghul revelation torwards the end.


The Dark Knight Rises is much better than The Dark Knight. Ledger's portrayal of Joker is the major reason people rate it so high. Besides that, there wasn't really anything special about the movie.


So there wasn't anything special but the main villain who the story was centered around...

Which is why I didn't enjoy it as much. Being centred around a single character (albeit, as well as he performed) made the plot much narrow for my liking.

#59 sam the d00d

sam the d00d

    Legend

  • Members
  • 5,153 posts
  • Location: Missouri

Posted 23 January 2013 - 11:03 PM

I really didn't like the Talia reveal towards the end. I just don't think it was well executed. Main reason I don't like Rises as much is the writing. The dialogue between characters just seems to be set up for punchlines at time. Also I didn't like how certain things were edited, such as the climax, how Bruce just somehow magically appears in Gotham even though its previously established there's practically no way of getting in, and how the way it was edited made the sense of time feel weird. They were in that city for months, but the way the editing was done made it feel like just a week or two. Not saying it's a bad movie, but Dark Knight just felt more tight, if you know what I mean.

#60 D'Evil

D'Evil

    Oh there'll be a hot time in the ole town tonight

  • Members
  • 7,793 posts
  • Location: Brooklyn Zoo
  • SEN (PS3): Ask, and you shall receive.

Posted 23 January 2013 - 11:10 PM

 

This pretty much sums up my feelings about DKR.