Jump to content

Overalls that need changing.


*Undertaker16-0

Recommended Posts

Well i know dat the overalls are not exact but some of them need changing. Such as Ric Flair i think is to high 87, and Kennedy is to low 84 i think, Chris Masters is also to high 87, and Umaga is to low 83, and from rumors i heard Taker's is 89 which i dont like i want him to be a 92 or 93. Who do u think needs changing of their overall attributes?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Undertaker14-0' post='793763' date='Oct 22 2006, 01:53 AM']Well i know dat the overalls are not exact but some of them need changing. Such as Ric Flair i think is to high 87, and Kennedy is to low 84 i think, Chris Masters is also to high 87, and Umaga is to low 83, and from rumors i heard Taker's is 89 which i dont like i want him to be a 92 or 93. Who do u think needs changing of their overall attributes?[/quote]
True it is quite dumb how most peoples overalls are in the 80's
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='The Monkey Farmer' post='793767' date='Oct 22 2006, 12:55 AM'][quote name='Undertaker14-0' post='793763' date='Oct 22 2006, 01:53 AM']
Well i know dat the overalls are not exact but some of them need changing. Such as Ric Flair i think is to high 87, and Kennedy is to low 84 i think, Chris Masters is also to high 87, and Umaga is to low 83, and from rumors i heard Taker's is 89 which i dont like i want him to be a 92 or 93. Who do u think needs changing of their overall attributes?[/quote]
True it is quite dumb how most peoples overalls are in the 80's
[/quote]

Yaa man.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yaa man Taker deserves to be high dats da only reason i put dis post cuz of i heard dat he was only goin to be 89 i wasnt to fond of dat.

[quote name='Ewok_3000' post='793797' date='Oct 22 2006, 01:05 AM']yep Undertaker's overall shuld be 92-93.
i'm glad Kane still has the same.
also glad that Big Show's overall is higher this year as well[/quote]

Kane's overall was 86 in dis game wasnt it 87 for SVR 2006? I forgot.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='The Monkey Farmer' post='794013' date='Oct 22 2006, 01:49 AM'][quote name='Ewok_3000' post='794008' date='Oct 22 2006, 02:48 AM']
To reply to Undertaker 14-0, Kane's overall rating in SVR2006 was 86.
and it's 86 in SVR2007 as well.
and Umaga's overall rating shuld be higher[/quote]
What is Umaga's overall
[/quote]

His overall is 83

[quote name='Ewok_3000' post='794008' date='Oct 22 2006, 01:48 AM']To reply to Undertaker 14-0, Kane's overall rating in SVR2006 was 86.
and it's 86 in SVR2007 as well.
and Umaga's overall rating shuld be higher[/quote]

Ok if it then it is den.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Umaga and Kane should be like 88 maybe higher for Kane. Does anyone think Batista should be 89. I think he should be in the 90s. He beat Triple H 3 times in a row (could have more wins in the future) and he is 95. To you guys what should Batista be because I think what he has now is unfair it makes me so :censored: angry.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Viscera for his size should be WAY higher than 79.

Big Show, same as Viscera. I mean, Kid Kash has the same overall than him.

Mr. Kennedy needs to be higher

Umaga, is a better wrestler than an 83.

REY MYSTERIO AS A 90?!?!?! What has THQ came up to? He not as good as a 90.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...