Guest Fight Me. Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 It has been over a week since The Rock defeated John Cena at WrestleMania XXVIII and then went on to reveal his vision of becoming WWE Champion again on Monday Night Raw. On the same night, Brock Lesnar made a surprising return to the WWE with an F5 heard around the world on John Cena. During the WrestleMania NY/NJ press conference, The Rock announced that he will be at the event in 2013. On the day of WrestleMania XXVIII, Brock Lesnar signed a one year contract, which means he will also likely be at WrestleMania XXIX. A lot can happen within the next year. A year ago, Brock Lesnar was still a UFC fighter and The Rock was bringing it via satellite. Who knows, maybe Brock or Rock can go on to win the WWE Championship at SummerSlam. Maybe the other can go on to win the 2013 Royal Rumble and main event WrestleMania. Maybe these guys end up facing each other for the WWE Championship at the Grandest Stage of Them All. Brock Lesnar could even decide to stay and extend his contract. A lot can happen from here to April 7, 2013. What do you guys think, do these guys deserve another run as WWE Champion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misatouki Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 Neither of them really deserve or need another run with the title, but another Brock Lesnar title run could make for some interesting stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avenger. Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 They don't need the title but I wouldn't mind any of them holding it, as long as they don't face each other for the title at Mania. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
вlueprint⁴ Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 Both deserve it and I personally prefer Rock more getting another run.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M3:16 Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 I dont think Brock does because Brock openly and publicly trashed the WWE any chance he could and the only reason he is back is because he cant cut it in MMA again while the Rock doesnt need the wwe and is doing it cause he enjoys it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MysteriousN Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 Personially i dont believe they deserve the title, but either of them winning it will bring big name reconition back to the top of the wwe and presitiage to the title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion™ Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 I voted for The Rock. He loves the business. Brock has said openly he hated the WWE. And personally Rock deserves it more imo, and I like him more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~PsychoCentral~ Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 I'd rather see The Rock with the title than Lesnar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy. Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 When talking about the WWE Championship, neither deserve to hold it. We're living in the present now, guys. This isn't the Attitude Era. No matter how much The Rock or Brock did for the company, it held its own without them, too. And it did it with the support of the rest of the roster. So, in my opinion, a majority of the logical roster deserve the title more than either of them. With that said, I won't mind a simple One-on-One match at WrestleMania XXIX. Rock has already demonstrated that he's still got it in him. The only variable in the equation is Brock Lesnar, who I believe won't disappoint. So, I'm all for it! But the WWE Championship? No, although I'm ready to take confronts for saying this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MopOfVirtue Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 Both deserve it, but seeing as Brock will be appearing more regularly, and the fact that he's a legit UFC champion, it would do the title wonders if he was to hold it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dihards Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 When talking about the WWE Championship, neither deserve to hold it. We're living in the present now, guys. This isn't the Attitude Era. Brock wasn't involved with the Attitude Era. These guys are major draws for the company, I think both deserve a title run with one of them putting someone like Punk over for the strap at a major PPV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazman™ Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 Yes Yes The Rock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chazzle. Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 Yes Yes Both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vapor Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 Yes, yes, both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy. Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 When talking about the WWE Championship, neither deserve to hold it. We're living in the present now, guys. This isn't the Attitude Era. Brock wasn't involved with the Attitude Era. These guys are major draws for the company, I think both deserve a title run with one of them putting someone like Punk over for the strap at a major PPV. Attitude Era was just an example I presented. As for major draws, that's exactly my point. Their match would get equal exposure, whether for the title or not. But by not having it for the title, they are getting themselves another high-profile match which is a win-win situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E#37 Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 -Yes -Yes -Both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Sy™ Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 Pretty much what Punker said. I'm not against a singles match between the stars of the Attitude and Ruthless Aggression eras, respectively. But since both most likely won't appear on a weekly basis in the coming months, I don't think they should go to WrestleMania to face each other for the WWE Title, probably in the main event. Although it certainly wouldn't be the end of the world if (B)Rock is gonna win the Title, preferably towards the end of the year (not around Mania), I feel it's time for the new generation to step up (like they're doing right now). It'd be a different story if these legends wouldn't clash for the title, but instead faced fresher people for the championship. I guess the WWE has this pretty much set though. And neither needs to win the Royal Rumble match. If Jericho, a wrestler who never got this accomplishment, couldn't win the Rumble because it was time to catapult a fresh face into the WM Championship Match (= the price isn't the Main Event spot anymore) this year, I don't see why Rocky or Lesnar should win the match for the second time in '13. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brahma Bull Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 Yes, Yes, Both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulie Walnuts Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 I dont recall Brock stating he hates the WWE, just the schedule. With that said I think Brock could do with another run, I voted no for Rock for the simple fact that he isn't around enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WillowTheWhisp Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 YES/YES/LESNAR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Almost Easy Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 Personally, I think Lesnar will be sticking around a lot longer than The Rock. I think Lesnar as champion would be amazing, especially if he maintains his working relationship with Laurinitis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Dreadful Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 No, No, neither.. Lesnar and Johnson left WWE to pursue other things in their career. the WWE has done fine without them over the past several years. there are guys there now that have been busting their ass, traveling 300 days of the year, working Raw, SD, PPV's and house shows. Johnson and Lesnar will not be working house shows, Lesnar is making what, 40 appearances through next WM?!, who knows when ol' Dwayne will show up next since he's filming 4 movies this year, that'll take up most of his time. and before anyone says, "well maybe they should step up their game", it's kinda hard to step up their game when their career get put on hold so Lesnar and Johnson gets put in front of them(and we all know what happen last time everyone's career got put on hold for Lesnar year's ago) just for a ratings boost and so Vince can make more money. that is not fair to the guys who are working A FULL schedule and are all ready potential top contenders to the WWE/WHC championships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dihards Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 When talking about the WWE Championship, neither deserve to hold it. We're living in the present now, guys. This isn't the Attitude Era. Brock wasn't involved with the Attitude Era. These guys are major draws for the company, I think both deserve a title run with one of them putting someone like Punk over for the strap at a major PPV. Attitude Era was just an example I presented. As for major draws, that's exactly my point. Their match would get equal exposure, whether for the title or not. But by not having it for the title, they are getting themselves another high-profile match which is a win-win situation. Equal exposure, I agree but say someone like the The Rock or Lesnar (both are HUGE draws) drops the belt after their feud (assuming they have one of course) to someone like Punk (Using Punk because he's a well established babyface), not only will the belt actually mean something (because of who was holding it i.e Brock/Rock) but it would elevate Punk to Cena's level (or even beyond). The belt IMO doesn't matter in the Rock v Lesnar feud, just what happens after. Having someone Cody Rhodes (an example) losing the belt to Punk wouldn't benefit Rhodes or Punk in the slightest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockstar™ Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 Both deserve it, two of the biggest names in the business. Both imo are legends. Lesnar, yes maybe he hasn't really attained legendary status yet, but I do believe he has had a huge impact since his debut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Hell Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 No, no and neither. Let the youth develop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.