Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Yeah,it was removed for whatever reason Then people started spectulating..
  3. Today
  4. Yo, champions are protected. Is this.. logic?
  5. WWE Draft 2024 Rules On SmackDown there will be four rounds, 16 total picks On Raw there will be six rounds, 24 total picks Champions on each brand are protected Women's Tag Team Champions are eligible SmackDown will pick first on Friday Raw will pick first on Monday Rosters lock Monday, May 6th * = switched brands (Raw to SmackDown/vice versa) * = called up from NXT Night 1: Friday Night SmackDown - 26th April 2024 Night 2: Monday Night Raw - 29th April 2024 Feel free to make predictions until the Draft is over!
  6. I think it was last year that he literally said that he knows he will get into trouble sooner or later, but doesnt care because stuff like locking stuff behind a mode is dumb and he wont stand for that because its content people paid for. 2k24 was Status mainly taunting 2k to take actions. I dont think him putting a target on others back is nice, but he isnt wrong that a ton of views etc the wwe2k games get are due to mods. The Moderation for these games is trash for a long game, that is not something new. The Problem with the nude Pictures and naked caws is a well known problem that 2k has never really dealt with. Its a unfortunate situation where i could see 2k also kind of having their hands tied. The WWE is allegedly super strict and so i can see 2k also being in a bit of a tough spot. But you wont see me defend a big company...especially one that delivers medicore stuff like wwe2k24. Especially one that once was playing good guys with modders to learn how they get mods into the game...just for them to bring a patch that tried to stop them doing that. There are pretty much two angles, the moral angle where 2k is in the wrong since Status etc are not uploading anything that hurts the game negatively, and the legal angle where of course 2k had to take actions against people who broke the TOS.
  7. I honestly don't remember him being banned in the first place. Didn't they just remove his stuff?
  8. MartyM has uploaded an ecw arena, so he not "banned" anymore...
  9. TK went for the mega powers handshake and got got by Jack Perry and The Elite! I expected TK to take a bump by Jack Perry and wasn't so surprised as soon as he got called out but not by the young bucks..until they started to pick him and didn't expect Daddy Khan to make a cameo!
  10. Really. No. This was covered in the interview. When you are a nextmaker you are represented 2K and you are not allowed to promote things that breaks the TOS.
  11. They’re still around so no they haven’t gotten in trouble at all
  12. one is a violation the other is free speech that like saying all news agency r guilty of reporting a crime cuz it promotes the crime status when he got the game sign what pretty much biding contract agreement he broke it he got punish it pretty black and white
  13. How you think the rules "should be" isn't how the rules *are*. Smacktalks has been given lines in the sand from 2K. He's still doing his thing because he stays within those lines. Status (arrogantly) decided he didn't care about the lines in the sand 2K drew. He thought he could do whatever he wanted, and then he found out he was wrong.
  14. Was there any other takeways from the video with him, Grix, and Fatal?
  15. If what Status is doing is breaking the TOS and frowned upon they shouldn't be allowed to promote it saying "Hey go download this guys work we approve of it!". Status has provided them with content to make views off for a long time, without him they aint got much to make videos about outside of patches.
  16. They report news pertaining to this series. What Status does is newsworthy. As far as I know, that isn't a violation of any agreements. What Status is doing is. That's the difference.
  17. If they're not getting banned or in trouble then unban Status. They obviously think its alright for them to promote his stuff, then whats the issue?
  18. you cant say they haven't got any repercussions or not but the truth his lot of status stuff sucked yeah creations r good but I had more crashes using his stuff then other created and his hack arenas sucked
  19. still obsess with me all these years that even more sad
  20. So then your issue isn't Status being banned, but other people not being banned?
  21. Whether you're for or against Status' banning, either way please don't give Austin any more attention.
  22. Exactly that was my whole point. None of them have gotten any repercussions. And smacktalks was the main person posting his stuff Willy nilly to get views. He does this all the time. He was the one who posted about that face logo glitch in 2k16. I told him not to do it. His response: “they’re done with the game they won’t patch it anymore” like they make the game every year genius.
  23. And this is the exact reason they put this place down. mall of you I’m sure have benefited from his content or expertise one way or another. Whether he deserves it or not.
  24. I mean Status himself has said he's fine with being banned, he knows he broke the TOS, his issue is all the others who promote his stuff that are in with 2K getting no bans or consequences, they promote his stuff all the time and help promote the game by doing it. All these guys use his content for views and 2K is fine with it.
  25. still sad and in the grand scale doesn't matter I have no problem with 2k doing this status new what he was doing what can happen u play with fire enough u will be burned
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...